low light seascapesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
low light seascapesAt Caloundra a couple of weeks ago
I know the first two are very similar in composition but cant decide which I like better.. click for larger Thanks Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
Re: low light seascapesMy pick would be #3. #2 needs the horizon straightened.
I do find myself coming back to #1, mainy to imagine what else there is there, maybe a landscape shot might help here....not sure. #4 would look great with a pano style crop. There are some very nice tones in these pictures - curse all you people with nice sunrises ....not a cloud in the sky. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: low light seascapes
That's the curvature of the Earth, Gerry. Robert, Of the first 2, I prefer #2. For me, the lower angle of view with the rocks on the rh side provide an anchor to the image. The higher angle on the first image seem to provide a leading line into the image, but without the benefit of the anchor point. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: low light seascapesReally love the soft tones on #1
Great work
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|