Post Processing suggestions?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Post Processing suggestions?

Postby tasadam on Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:31 pm

Gidday. It's been a while since I posted anything, though I have been lurking a bit.

I have been confusing myself with the brightness levels in images.

In PS CS3, editing the RAW, clicking on Auto gives mixed results, and I usually like to compare Auto and Default, then adjust myself to what I think the scene looked like.
I'm generally trying to recreate the image as I saw it rather than an edited look, HDR for example.

So there's this image. Here are two different edits of it, differences are brightness and contrast levels in the RAW adjustment, all other settings are the same in each.

My concern is that though it looked ok once I had edited it, once I uploaded it to my redbubble site, it looked a bit dark.

Image

Image

Which is better? Why? Any other suggestions?
Share what you know, learn what you don't.
Wilderness Photography of Tasmania http://www.tasmaniart.com.au
User avatar
tasadam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania

Re: Post Processing suggestions?

Postby biggerry on Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:07 pm

I prefer the lighter version, it feels like there is a bit more dynamic range in this one, but that could be my imagination. Also i use quite a dark setting on my monitor so that also comes into play.

I do a similiar thing when adjusting the contrast and brightness, select the 'Auto' option to see what it gives then go back and manually apply it based on waht i like, I rarely find myself using 'Auto' result since I find it a bit too contrasty and bright, however it is great for getting a 3rd opinion, in a sense?!

maybe consider applying the settings to only one part of the image, in particular the area of interest, the mushroom, apply brightness to this local area and keep the remaining background slightly darker.

hth a little...
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Post Processing suggestions?

Postby photohiker on Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:35 pm

Just to be contrary, I like the first one. I'm finding the lighter objects in the second image to be too light and washed out, especially the leaves.

Are those leaves on the fungus Beech? How's the Fagus this year?

Michael
photohiker
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Burnside, South Australia.

Re: Post Processing suggestions?

Postby tasadam on Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:45 pm

photohiker wrote:Are those leaves on the fungus Beech? How's the Fagus this year?

Michael

Thanks for the replies so far.
The leaves are Myrtle.

As I said on the Redbubble description,
On the floor of a typical Tasmanian forst in Autumn. The mushrooms thrive at this time of year, and this location was no exception. This one was found growing amongst the Sphagnum Moss on the walk to Winterbrook Falls, northern Tasmania. The photograph is taken as the scene presented itself – naturally.
The Myrtle leaves give the mushroom some reference to size.
On Aptil 18 2009 when this was taken, it took me 4 hours to walk one direction, and 8 minutes to walk back, such was the photography subject content in this area.


Good Fagus discussion for 2009 HERE and HERE.

I took a Fagus photo last month, that can be seed HERE.
For those that don't know, Fagus, or Tanglefoot, or Deciduous Beech, are common names for Nothofagus Gunnii, closely related to Myrtle (Nothofagus Cunninghamii), and is Australias's only native winter-deciduous plant, only found in wet alpine areas of Tasmania. My redbubble image has got a link if you want to read more about it.
Share what you know, learn what you don't.
Wilderness Photography of Tasmania http://www.tasmaniart.com.au
User avatar
tasadam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania

Re: Post Processing suggestions?

Postby colin_12 on Fri May 01, 2009 8:29 pm

On my monitor the first looks more natural and less washed out.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: Post Processing suggestions?

Postby big pix on Fri May 01, 2009 8:49 pm

you could try to vignette each of the 4 corner's to make your subject stand out more......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Re: Post Processing suggestions?

Postby digitor on Fri May 01, 2009 8:51 pm

First one looks better to me.

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Re: Post Processing suggestions?

Postby NeoTiger on Fri May 01, 2009 9:29 pm

I'd also say first one is better on my monitor. The second one looks too bright.
NeoTiger
Member
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: Melbourne CBD


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques