Abstract: feedback pleaseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Abstract: feedback pleaseI'm looking for honest feedback here. No need to be afraid of posting a compliment or a criticism.
I like abstract work, and I'm trying to create something colourful in that vein. This is a hand-held three second exposure, manipulated in PS with the application of the underpainting filter, plus a boost with the Vibrance slider in LR. I am prepared to keep experimenting. Am I wasting my time? Or are there possibilities? I'm just finding it a bit hard to be objective with this work. Thanks to anyone who takes the trouble to reply. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Abstract: feedback pleaseAt the moment, it looks like a blurry photgraph. I think you need to take it further so that the image is splotches of colour rather than OOF Chrysanthenums which is what it looks to me at the moment. Also fill the frame with the flowers so the colour splotches cover the frame.
HTH Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Abstract: feedback pleaseTrevor
Apart from what's already been said (with which I concur) it also seems a little dull - maybe a curves adjustment would help. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Abstract: feedback pleaseYes - good feedback - thanks to you both
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Abstract: feedback pleaseThis isn't quite in accordance with my original concept, but occurred as part of the development from feedback. It's good fun playing, anyway!
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Abstract: feedback pleaseThese images will work best if you name them 'Dream sequence 1 & 2'
They do have a dreamlike quality. Regards
Matt. K
Re: Abstract: feedback pleaseI agree with the comments of Greg and Peter: this needs to be taken further out into the wilderness. Whereas often we may introduce micro-adjustments to fine tune something in our images, here you want to shift things around by the handful.
Left field is where you want this to go. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Abstract: feedback please
The second image beguines to be more abstract, but it lacks dynamism or movement. Consider using one of the filters of your image editing software, and keep having fun.
Re: Abstract: feedback pleaseHey Trevor
For me, the first doesn't work as an abstract because...it's not. Each of us will have a different line drawn in the sand denoting where actual stops and abstract begins. For me he first image stays safely on the actual side, albeit with an interesting spin. The second, however, meets my expectations of this kind of art - encouraging questions, making me wnat to find substance and looking at alternative meaings behind the shot. Clearly I need more sleep but I think you get what I mean!! Cheers, Simon Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Re: Abstract: feedback pleaseHi Simon
Great to hear from you! And it looks like you're living closer to the city now? My original thought was that I wanted the image to be recognisable as flowers. Abstract isn't necessarily totally devoid of any recognition of the subject matter. As you correctly point out, it just depends where the line is drawn. In any case, the critiques of the original were on the money - it needed more pop, and there was certainly room to push the envelope. I'm having a bit of fun anyway, and I may come up with something more interesting one day. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|