All At SeaModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
All At SeaHi.
These are pics that I took a while ago and have just processed now using recently learnt methods. I've included one photo twice (two different treatments). Happy for any comments. Thanks. Canon 50D - EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS - EF 100-400 L - EF 50 f1.8
Re: All At Sea#1 Ok, but would benefit with a tighter crop. ATM it lacks a focus for the eye.
#2 The halos do nothing for me. #1 is better #3 I like the colour of the water, but again, a tighter crop would benefit the shot. If it were an agrier sea, this crop would work as it would evoke the puniness of man Vs nature, but as it is ... #4 does nothing for me. No focus to draw the eye into the photo. (I take lots like this!) #5 Again a tighter crop would help. Also it seems artificial to me. Perhaps over sharpened? Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: All At SeaFair call. Composition has always been a weak point. I sometimes shoot like an archiver.
Yeah, probably over sharpened. I'm still experimenting with a lot of stuff to see what works and what doesn't. Canon 50D - EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS - EF 100-400 L - EF 50 f1.8
Re: All At SeaI'm with Greg, sorry none of these do much for me. The colours also look very artificial, did you change the colour balance and oversaturate??
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: All At SeaOversaturate, no. Over contrast, yes.
Thanks for the feedback. I am getting a good understanding of what controls I need to ease up on. I do tend to hit pretty hard on the Contrast and Clarity controls to the point where I do go overboard - and I know that I do that. It is just a matter of me learning to say when enough is enough. I think that I know enough about the photoshop controls now to be dangerous. I now have to learn how to use them properly and construct a proper workflow and learn to pick what tool to use at the correct time. I think that my composition has improved a little since I took these (these are a little old), but there is massive room for improvement there. Canon 50D - EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS - EF 100-400 L - EF 50 f1.8
Re: All At Sea
I was told once by a famous artist, the secret to a great painting is not knowing how to paint, but knowing when to stop. øne day I'll learn too. But it won't be this day Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|