Some portraits for critique

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some portraits for critique

Postby surenj on Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:03 pm

Recently had a chance to photograph some willingly unwilling and unwillingly willing subjects. As usual I would love to hear your comments and critique. Thanks for looking.

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby Glen on Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:33 pm

Surenj, beautiful lighting on 2 and 3 :up:
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby craig.rohse on Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:40 pm

Very nice surenj, they are sooo sharp, like the lighting as well.
"Old school" (Olympus OM 1&2SP )
User avatar
craig.rohse
Member
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:16 am
Location: Austins Ferry, Hobart

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby biggerry on Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:40 pm

I like that last one! Great idea with the coloured light behind the doors...The oval shaped glass pane in the last is just in teh wrong spot, I think the little tackers head should cover it up a bit - I can imagine saying this in hindsight is easy :wink: Also I reckon I think some eye contact may have helped too, however this is obviously dependent on what look you were going for!

willingly unwilling and unwillingly willing subjects.

no prizes for the unwilling one!

Is that a plaster on her foot there or a big sock?

As glen said, though, great lighting....
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby aim54x on Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Nice work...almost everything I was thinking of has been mentioned...

On a more mundane note...I cant work out the reflection on your glasses...what did you use to light that first shot?
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby sheepie on Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:06 pm

Number two's a winner :)

Love the lighting, the angle of the background infers action, while the eye contact with the keys reflects wonderfully with the joy shown in the face. If anything, maybe a bit more of the keys could be in view, but I'm not certain - maybe the small amount shown adds in some way a little intrigue?

In any case, it's a great shot. Number 3 is also good, but for me not as strong as the 2nd.
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby biggerry on Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:30 pm

what did you use to light that first shot?


ceiling fan/light :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby colin_12 on Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:35 pm

I think the lighting in #3 is great, the second has a great expression on her face.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby Alex on Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:19 am

I really love No.3! The lighting, compositon and background are all very well handled.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Some portraits for critique

Postby surenj on Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:53 am

Thanks everyone for their comments.

aim54x wrote:what did you use to light that first shot?

Cameron, I just used a silver umbrella....

biggerry wrote:
what did you use to light that first shot?

ceiling fan/light :up:

Gerry, That is a great idea to make a hard continuous light source into a soft source by using a slow shutter and attaching the light to a fan! :mrgreen:

biggerry wrote:Is that a plaster on her foot there or a big sock?

I think the sock is slipping off! I didn't notice that....

biggerry wrote:The oval shaped glass pane in the last is just in teh wrong spot, I think the little tackers head should cover it up a bit - I can imagine saying this in hindsight is easy Also I reckon I think some eye contact may have helped too, however this is obviously dependent on what look you were going for!

I see your point about the oval glass pane... I will sift through the rest of the images to see whether I had got one by mistake...
eye contact was quite difficult as she only looked at her parents..... and smiled :shock:

biggerry wrote:coloured light behind the doors

I didn't use a coloured light! I wish I could have, but poon's triggers won't stand up to that much distance etc...This would be the all mighty sun streaming through. Just gelled the flash :mrgreen:

sheepie wrote:the angle of the background infers action

I can see what you mean Leon.. when I look at the ones with the background straight, it would appear to be less dynamic. The crooked background was a mistake in my mind but I noticed halfway so half my photos are straight!
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques