Page 1 of 1

Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:23 pm
by Photopotamus
So with my better half out to dinner with her girlfriends, I donned the apron, raided the fridge & pantry and made a little dessert. Choc-Cherry cake. As is only appropriate in these situations, it was accompanied by a scoop of vanilla ice cream.

BEFORE
Image

AFTER
Image
Apparently, it's quite acceptable...

So here's what I know:

The colour on these is "a bit warm". I don't have Photoshop and have been editing mostly in Canon's DPP software. Although there is "click WB", how do I correct without a decent reference? I'm gathering that this is where a "grey card" falls into the equation?

Does Canon's DPP calibrate to a grey reference?

All other comments, criticisms & remarks considered! :up:

Re: Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:41 pm
by gstark
Those images appear to be a tad small.

As in MIA.

Re: Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:14 pm
by Photopotamus
Really? No pix...?

:?

Here's a link to the smaller set. Maybe size does matter after all...?
Before
Image

After
Image

Re: Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:40 pm
by gstark
Photopotamus wrote:Maybe size does matter after all...?


Nope.

I'd say that your hosting site doesn't permit direct linking.

Re: Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 12:53 am
by muzz
I can see all of them.

Re: Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:16 am
by surenj
Not bad Photopotamus. I would use back to front type of light for this sort of shot... Perhaps some more props ?fork etc

Keep em coming... Also would like to see the WB fixed version. Just slide the WB slider until it looks ok. Otherwise you could use the curves in PS and set the white point with one click. Not sure about DPP.

Re: Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:03 am
by Reschsmooth
I couldn't see them either unless I copied jpg url into the address bar.

Nice looking cake.

My comments:

1. For the sake of taking the photograph, use a plate instead of the bowl - the high edge of the bowl reduces the viewing of the food too much.
2. WB needs to be corrected, but you knew that.
3. For the sake of the photograph, you need to diffuse the light a bit to reduce the specular highlights which are a little distracting. A light tent or other soft light modifiers (brollie/softbox) would help. However, this may be overkill if you are just looking to take photos of great food. :D

Re: Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:50 am
by Mr Darcy
I couldn't even see the the jpg url. However, I copied the post into TextEdit &it saw the pictures.
Oh and very oddly, I can see them in the history in the "post a Reply" history section.

It obviously wasn't very good cake. You didn't even lick the bowl. :lol:


I think the first works, but agree that a plate would have been better than a bowl for the photograph.
I disagree that the specular highlights detract from the image. I like them.

Re: Anyone for cake?

PostPosted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:43 am
by Photopotamus
Thanks to all for slogging it out with the pictures. Strange how Picasa works for some and not others. :?

I suppose I'm off to join Flickr...