A few Odd angry shots for critiqueModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A few Odd angry shots for critiqueA different view of Sydney CBD
A brief encounter The fabulous Rocks area, Sydney My grey gull takes the dim leagues with fearful eye Regards
Matt. K
Re: A few Odd angry shots for critique....... nice series..... the second is the stand out for me, and the Gulls are also special
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: A few Odd angry shots for critiqueI like the third image, maybe cropping the top dead space off might help? that and a bit of bumped contrast would have me sold i reckon.
I like the the layers in this image, street level, advert level and transport level, whilst not a conventional way to lead the eye into an image, I think it works quite well and find myself drawn from the lower part of the image thru to the top...am spinning BS here? just thinking out aloud Last edited by biggerry on Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: A few Odd angry shots for critiqueMatt - great series.
I think the standout is the 2nd image!! With some careful PS work, I think it'd be even better with the adult's head removed from behind the near silhouette of the kids. Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: A few Odd angry shots for critiqueVery interesting set of images there Matt. I am drawn to those gulls, that photo is unlike anything I have seen.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: A few Odd angry shots for critique
It is very unique indeed! One vote for POTW.
Re: A few Odd angry shots for critiqueLove all four, but #3 is my favourite.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: A few Odd angry shots for critiqueActually looking at this again;
What do you think about leaving the shutter open for longer on the 3rd. The train and the cars would be light trails, and pedestrians more of a blur. That would really set the mood for this area.
Re: A few Odd angry shots for critiqueThanks for your comments folks! You might be interested to know that the seagull shot was exposed using fill flash giving the gulls a little more detail on the underside. Surenji...I like your idea and will attempt it next time I'm in the location. I will need to use a tripod which wasn't used for the posted image.
Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|