A few more perusers for critiqueModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A few more perusers for critiqueMans best
For love of a ramp A tree Playing with shadows Regards
Matt. K
Re: A few more perusers for critiquenot really feelin 1 and 2 matt.
#3 is a great shot, love the noisy lomo-esque effect. when i first thought it i thought the twig at the botom right of the tree trunk was a guy walking behind it ! lol #4 is mesmerising...intoxicating. just something else. wonderful. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: A few more perusers for critique
and all i get is this crusty freakin' mat to sit on I like #4 - playing with shadows sums it up nicely....nicely picked up. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: A few more perusers for critiqueI have to admit that I dont see #1 and #2 they seem a bit plain. I do really like #3 though it is brillant, #4 is a bit textbook for me. Nice to see images though!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: A few more perusers for critiqueAll 4 for me - minimalist, but stunning - I've missed this
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Re: A few more perusers for critique
I agree. And I think the toned down contrast really works as well. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: A few more perusers for critiqueI like #1, although it seems low-contrast.
#2 definitely looks washed out. In ACR I'd increase the Blacks slider somewhat. And what on earth is a "peruser"? I can't see any "people who read things thoroughly" (which is the closest thing I can find in a dictionary) waiting to be critiqued...
Re: A few more perusers for critiqueLove your work Matt!!!
You have got the eye for "something different" and make "normal" photos look great. "Old school" (Olympus OM 1&2SP )
Re: A few more perusers for critiqueNumber 1. This could be shot better from a lot lower and closer angle. The dogs composure and look would suit this shot better I think.
Number 2. Not sure what you were trying to captuere here but I think the focus of the picture is the building, and the old duck in the scooter just adds an unnecessary addition to the story. I would have waited for her to pass. I think the shadows on the steps add enough impact to the picture without the scooter. Number 3. Looks like it is framed nicely but as a whole it does not draw me in and make me stop and look. I just tend to glance over it everytime i view it. Number 4. This was well spotted, and as previously said is quite text book, and going with that I think you would get most benifit from this shot by converting to black and white. Hope im not to harsh. Ive seen plenty of your work on here and its outstanding, just this set has not "suckered me in. Jase Guess What! ........I Have A Fever........And The Only Perscription........Is More Cowbell.
Re: A few more perusers for critique#1 may need a B/W treatment perhaps. The dog looks sad. Maybe it is winter in Melbourne? (I would be sad too).
#4 is very interesting and sometimes hard to photograph as the camera's focussing abilities get muddled by the multiple lines etc. Well done. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: A few more perusers for critiqueThanks all! I enjoy and learn from your comments!
Peruser....a thing to be perused...my definition and it will eventually get put into a dictionary. Image #2 is a social comment on the lack of ramps for handicapped folk....the stairs, the wheelchair....get it? The dog image works for me....but then I'm a dog lover and perhaps am reading it more instinctively than most of you. Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|