Page 1 of 1

White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:43 pm
by Chica
Hi everyone....

Here is a photo of the white tiger I took at Singapore Zoo - in 4 different versions! Would be interested in comments and critiques - I am very new to photoshop so any comments more than welcome.

Version 1: Straight out out of the camera:
Image

Version 2: Slight adjustments, corrected levels, sharpened a bit
Image

Version 3 - More photoshopping to get rid of water 'junk' and added a little saturation
Image

Version 4: Black and white (obviously)
Image

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:50 pm
by surenj
#3 is the best IMHO.

While the BW is good, it seems to take away the context of the photo somewhat.

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:56 pm
by Big V
Cathy, number 3 for me

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:03 pm
by biggerry
While the BW is good, it seems to take away the context of the photo somewhat.


:agree:
there is not much colour in these images hence the BW option is definitely viable, however the BW makes the tiger look like he/she is floating in the water at a funny angle, the inclusion of the step or stuff in the top left gives the image context, hence #3 is my choice here as well.

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:14 pm
by hrpremier
Number III for me.

I think the 4th version looks to obvious that it's been photoshopped while the little colour in the water ands interest and keeps the image believeable.

Jase

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 3:50 pm
by Wink
Somewhere between 2 and 3 for me.

I agree with removing the crap floating on the water. However, you've removing the objects from under the water behind the tigers back and the ripple on the water creating a black empty space. That looks a little odd to me.

I'd say remove the floating debris and leave the underwater objects and ripples on the water.

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:23 pm
by aim54x
I will buck the trend here, on my screen all the reworked versions seem to have a bright spot at the base of the neck....this means I actually prefer the original the most, but if you rework the contrast adjustment to avoid this blown out highlight then somewhere near #3 is the go.

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:16 pm
by sirhc55
#2, reason being that the water junk does add some depth to an excellent photo.

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 12:15 am
by wendellt
i think the last version works best simply because the tiger sits against a clean background, which gives it a more surreal feeling. The orignal with all it's contextual clues to it's location makes it look more ordinary. I think what you have done is made the image more special and it's a very nice treatment and im a sucker for contrast

Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!

PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:46 am
by Hudo
For me I like the B&W version..

Hudo