White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!Hi everyone....
Here is a photo of the white tiger I took at Singapore Zoo - in 4 different versions! Would be interested in comments and critiques - I am very new to photoshop so any comments more than welcome. Version 1: Straight out out of the camera: Version 2: Slight adjustments, corrected levels, sharpened a bit Version 3 - More photoshopping to get rid of water 'junk' and added a little saturation Version 4: Black and white (obviously) My Red Bubble Site: http://www.redbubble.com/people/cathycormack
Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!#3 is the best IMHO.
While the BW is good, it seems to take away the context of the photo somewhat.
Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!
there is not much colour in these images hence the BW option is definitely viable, however the BW makes the tiger look like he/she is floating in the water at a funny angle, the inclusion of the step or stuff in the top left gives the image context, hence #3 is my choice here as well. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!Number III for me.
I think the 4th version looks to obvious that it's been photoshopped while the little colour in the water ands interest and keeps the image believeable. Jase Guess What! ........I Have A Fever........And The Only Perscription........Is More Cowbell.
Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!Somewhere between 2 and 3 for me.
I agree with removing the crap floating on the water. However, you've removing the objects from under the water behind the tigers back and the ripple on the water creating a black empty space. That looks a little odd to me. I'd say remove the floating debris and leave the underwater objects and ripples on the water.
Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!I will buck the trend here, on my screen all the reworked versions seem to have a bright spot at the base of the neck....this means I actually prefer the original the most, but if you rework the contrast adjustment to avoid this blown out highlight then somewhere near #3 is the go.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!#2, reason being that the water junk does add some depth to an excellent photo.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!i think the last version works best simply because the tiger sits against a clean background, which gives it a more surreal feeling. The orignal with all it's contextual clues to it's location makes it look more ordinary. I think what you have done is made the image more special and it's a very nice treatment and im a sucker for contrast
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Re: White tiger - from the original to the photoshopped version!For me I like the B&W version..
Hudo
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|