Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)Tried Friday morning at the horse track, to try and get the horses training in the mist as the sun came up. Only one word described it - Fail.
So went to Redhead beach on Saturday and had a bit more luck. Not brilliant shots, but satisfying to get something. What are your thoughts, what could be improved, small and large? (note from day, remember when you have switched off autofocus and the camera is no longer autofocusing!) not much happening so stuck a torch in the rock And when the sun finally poked out from behind the cloud and just getting reflection whizzzz, there goes life again.....
But now captured on a Canon 40D with bits http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehill/
Re: Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)The #1 is the strongest. It doesn't need a torch though. How long was the exposure? You could have used the torch to light paint the rocks in the foreground.
I am not convinced about the last two. hth.
Re: Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)I like the colours in #2, but the image seems to be lacking focus (not as in it's blurred, but as in the image doesn't have an object to focus on).
Re: Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)thanks
The first shots is 30 seconds The other two shots are with manual focus, which I forgot I had switched to, and yes are focused a touch close! whizzzz, there goes life again.....
But now captured on a Canon 40D with bits http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehill/
Re: Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)If you go earlier to the same spot in the #1 and lightpaint for 60 seconds, I reckon you could get a very nice print out of it! The greens on the rocks are great.
Re: Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)
lol, yep done that always the thought ' thats funny whys it blurry again' before it clicks.. I am buck the trend here and say the 2nd image the better of the 3, it has more evenly and clearly defined thirds with some very nice tones over them, the rock an dthe sun compete a bit, but i caould live with that, I think just a bit of PP to get a tad more light + contrast + saturation - not to much, just a touch, would help imo. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)I think you are getting better at this Waz.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Redhead Sunrise (beach that is)the first is my favourite....and i love the star that the torch has added to the image giving it another dimension.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|