Tree pose - for critique

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Tree pose - for critique

Postby Willy wombat on Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:00 am

Hi all

Was working with Irena to get some outdoor modelling images for her portfolio. We settled on a sunset yoga theme for the shoot.

Im interested to know your thoughts on the positioning of the model and the lighting here. Sadly I didnt have anyone to hold a reflector for me to ballance the shadows out on the right hand side of the image. The key question is, is the lighting and shadow too directional, or does it work?

Thanks
Steve

Image
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby tommyg on Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:15 am

I like the lighting, and the background goes well with the theme.

However, the grass and road behind I think are distracting. You could try chopping off the lower third of the image - although this might it look a little strange too.

If you are able to reshoot (with exactly the same cool background and flare from the sun :? ) I would try maybe a point of view where there is minimal foreground. Maybe on a beach would be better?

Cheers
Tom
Tom
Red Bubble
TLC Photography
Nikon D810, D700, D90 (IR)
tommyg
Member
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Mawson Lakes, Adelaide

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby gstark on Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:40 am

Hi Steve,

I think it is too directional, and the fall-off towards the bottom is too great for my liking as well.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby surenj on Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:48 am

Steve, is this an umbrella or softbox? Either way you could feather the light to get the best milage out of it?

If your camera handles overexposure ok, one could overexpose the face about 1 stop or so and recover the deatil in post while keeping the light on the legs?

Nice concept and I quite like it as it is but perhaps a slightly lower viewpoint to get rid of the road.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby Willy wombat on Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:18 pm

tommyg wrote:I like the lighting, and the background goes well with the theme.

However, the grass and road behind I think are distracting. You could try chopping off the lower third of the image - although this might it look a little strange too.

If you are able to reshoot (with exactly the same cool background and flare from the sun :? ) I would try maybe a point of view where there is minimal foreground. Maybe on a beach would be better?

Cheers
Tom



Thanks Tom - This was a tricky one because I wanted to shoot at an angle high above the water line to create depth in the image, and with the yoga pose I felt it was necessary to show what the whole body was doing. However, I also shot from different heights to see what effect that had. Here is one shot at a lower angle and with the feet removed. The light is also further around towards the front.

Image
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby Willy wombat on Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:20 pm

gstark wrote:Hi Steve,

I think it is too directional, and the fall-off towards the bottom is too great for my liking as well.


Thanks Gary for the feedback
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby Willy wombat on Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:25 pm

surenj wrote:Steve, is this an umbrella or softbox? Either way you could feather the light to get the best milage out of it?

If your camera handles overexposure ok, one could overexpose the face about 1 stop or so and recover the deatil in post while keeping the light on the legs?

Nice concept and I quite like it as it is but perhaps a slightly lower viewpoint to get rid of the road.


Hey this one was a softbox with my trusty SB800 speedlight. Thanks also for the feedback on the viewpoint.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby Oz_Beachside on Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:29 am

wow Steve, nice work. Your last few model portrait posts have improved each time.

the second image wins pants down. I think the tighter crop is stronger, removing the grass and cycling path, draws the viewers eye toward the person and their action. The horizon line is improved without the hotspot under the sun, and the styling of the pose channeling the sun through the hands I feel works well with the theme.

did you deliberately balance your composition to include the freight liner? perhaps clone that one out?

on your lighting, I think for a single light without the sun providing a back light, its pretty good. if I was to be critical, it would be the unnatural balance of color and direction that bothers me. since it looks too late in the day to get a rim light, or kicker, from the sun, a second bare speed light, right of frame and rearward of model would have just filled the shadows a bit for me, and returned some natural balance from the sun as a source (at least looking like the sun is the light source). As for your missing assitant, I know a guy that lives not far from you that could have given you a hand. Alternatively, leant you a stand and speedlight... :cheers: but not his new ringlight since its stuck in the Virgin Islands thanks to UPS...

Lastly, did you gel your speedlight? if you want I have some bastard amber at home you can have, to warm it up a bit.
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby zafra52 on Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:46 am

I think the problem is the person is facing the camera squarely, which is against the textbook advice. Instead, a pose showing the model at a slight angle maybe facing your right shoulder would have worked better.
I don't like the second image because it gives me the impression the image of the lady was cut out and superimposed on the sunset image. Anyway, if your intention is to show a frontal version of the postures then I guess you did alright.
Last edited by zafra52 on Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Tree pose - for critique

Postby tommyg on Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:37 pm

Definitely think the version without the distractions of the grass works well.

I like the sunset colours, they definetely remind me of the covers of new age music CDs etc :)

In the second photo, I think if you had all of thehands in the photo it would work better, and at the bottom just a little more of the right leg.

I don't mind the side lighting - I think it adds something to the image

Cheers
Tom
Red Bubble
TLC Photography
Nikon D810, D700, D90 (IR)
tommyg
Member
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Mawson Lakes, Adelaide


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques