Family BBQ

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Family BBQ

Postby sully on Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:55 pm

Here are a couple of pics I took on the weekend, first time using my new lens (50mm 1.8) so go easy!

f2.8, 1/320sec, iso400
Image

f1.8, 1/13sec, iso400 using the overhead light in the car
Normally wouldn't use that sort of shutter speed as it's nearly impossible to get a sharp image but was playing with the new lens and liked the lighting and mood it created
Image

f1.8, 1/60, iso400
This one's interesting lighting was due to natural light coming in through the front window, and a very yellow light behind. Apart from taking a different angle, is there a way to combat this?
Image

I've learned very quickly that this lens isn't sharp until about f2.8, but it's good to have the ability to go wider at a pinch... I will try and get some more up the next time I use it. Not much processing done on these, and what do you think about sharpness? eg the first especially, I think photobucket is sharpening them for me a bit?

Josh
User avatar
sully
Newbie
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:32 pm
Location: Mitcham, Melbourne

Re: Family BBQ

Postby Bindii on Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:04 pm

I've got the same lens and just adore it.. its sharp as a tack and sooooo much fun! I like your images btw the last one is a stand out for me with its great bokeh and good colours (well on my monitor anyway).. can I make a suggestion though.. in the first image of the older guy.. he needs more neck in the pic as it kinda looks like he's chopped off (an easy mistake to make and I know I've done it on more than one occassion lol).. and in the second I'm a little unsure on what the focus point is.. ideally her eye's should be focus but they look a little soft - although I really like the pose in this one! :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Re: Family BBQ

Postby sully on Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:51 pm

Haha the neck was chopped off, as I realised after the shot that there was a chair in the foreground which looks even worse! In regards to the second image, I believe the eyes are in focus, but as it was taken handheld at such a slow shutter speed and wide open, this is where the softness is coming from... I could be wrong though... The last is my favorite too, my girlfriend is a quirky type full of character and this picture shows some of that :)
User avatar
sully
Newbie
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:32 pm
Location: Mitcham, Melbourne

Re: Family BBQ

Postby gstark on Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:30 am

Hi Josh,

These are really good images, and you should be well satisfied with them. The first is nice and sharp, and the second has a great softness to it, which suits both the way it's been shot, as well as the subject. And I'm not at all troubled by the deep shadow on the lh side of your lady's face; this seems to suit the subject and image quite nicely.

In the third, you refer to the issue with the two different types (and colours) of light. That's a tough one; you could kill the internal light, or perhaps draw some curtains on the window.

What I would have probably done though is considered which of the light sources was the more powerful, and balanced my image towards that. As it stands, I think your image has been balanced towards the interior light source, and consequently the primary source - daylight - appears to be a little off colour in terms of its wb. Had you gone the other way, this would have added more warmth into the colouration.

If you shot this in raw, have a play with your wb settings, and see what you can do with it.

sully wrote:I've learned very quickly that this lens isn't sharp until about f2.8,


What you may be seeing is not so much just that the lens sharpens up as you stop down - which it certainly does - but also you might need to bear in mind that a large aperture settings you have a very narrow range of DoF. If your focus is even marginally off, this will be very evident in your images.

As you stop the lens down, your DoF range increases, and focus errors become less of an issue, but wide open they can be very obvious.

From what we're seeing here, this lens is very sharp at f/2.8, but I encourage you to play with it and see where it's best: find the lens's sweet spot, so that you can take advantage of it.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Family BBQ

Postby surenj on Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:04 pm

gstark wrote:This one's interesting lighting was due to natural light coming in through the front window, and a very yellow light behind. Apart from taking a different angle, is there a way to combat this?



Several ways; I assume you had manually set the WB to daylight.

1. Switch it off and use a reflector or off camera flash (which is daylight balanced)
2. Gel the tungsten light with lots of CTB gel to convert it to daylight
3. Use a gradient in photoshop to correct the colour
4. extreme method would be use a large CTO gel on the window to balance to tungsten and use tungten WB on camera.

Hope to see more of your work. :cheers:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques