zafra52 wrote:It is a bit late to cry about it now, but do you think the image would have been better if there wasnt filter glare?
Possibly not because it has a wonderful simplicity and realism to it and that's what caught my eyes. It is as if I were looking at the scene myself instead of the photographer. That’s how I would have seen it with the naked eye; and this is my humble opinion.
I am pretty undecided about the filter glare, but you have raised a very valid point, that sun did make me squint a bit.
surenj wrote:If you are bothered by it, you can still salvage it by carefully cloning and increasing contrast on that area.
Now that I look at this from my home monitor, #3 appears a little dark. Looking at the exif though, it was probably a pretty bright scene as you have removed about 7 stops of light from it!
That sounds like too much work for me....
but thanks for the suggestion.
What are you reading the exif with (I cant find anywhere in exiftool that reads -7 stops of light removed)?? I know that I didnt do anything like that in post, it was *working from memory* curve manipulation then some colour tempreture/contrast/saturation adjustment. There simply was nothing in those shadows worth pulling out....dark the image is, but I liked the overall look (maybe my monitors dont show it as dark as yours does)