Around the Rocks

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Around the Rocks

Postby Alpha_7 on Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:48 am

Well last night I had the privledge of taking a few work collengues including a blow in from the London office on a bit of a photo adventure around the Rocks and Observatory Hill. While I found it a little challenging at times helping them with their camera (3 different canon models just to make life confusing for me), I think we all got some shots we were happy with. I won't bore you with any of the cliched landscapes and views of the sunset and the bridge etc, but I thought I'd share two off the cuff strobist shots and two other random images from last nights shoot.

Found this creeping out between the pailings in one of the back lanes in the rocks (I may of overpumped the vignetting)
Image

This ones a bit weird, I just liked the light being on, and the fairly dark and rustic backend of this house. (not sure I'm happy with the crop)
Image

Olivia Strobist Style - this was actually candid I'd taken 10 shots of her while she was busy taking her own photos, then she finally turned around to see what I was doing (I was standing on a ledge with flash in hand probably 2.5 metres above her) just as she turned around and looked up the flash popped her straight in the eyes. Flash bare at 1/8
Image

Last shot was a bit of a balancing act, I wanted the nice tones in the last remaining sunset, but was trying to get a nice even level of flash on the stone and bronze (without too much specular highlights). Flash with Diffusor @ 1/4

Image


Hmmm looking at the preview it looks like forums are downsizing the pictures as then look slightly smaller on screen and there is a noticable loss of sharpness :( Anyone else noticing that ? The originals are 800 on the longest side
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Re: Around the Rocks

Postby surenj on Fri Jul 02, 2010 6:41 pm

I really like #1 for it's simplicity and tones. The only niggle is a little soft plant. Perhaps it's sharper in the original?

#4 you have done really well to balance flash with ambient here. The middle ground is lost and most likely wouldn't have contributed anyway. Only suggestion would have been to light paint the tree after the light had faded even further.

Alpha_7 wrote:Anyone else noticing that ? The originals are 800 on the longest side

Yes, I have noticed this to be an issue even when I post 780 pixel images. All my posts look significantly softer than original.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Around the Rocks

Postby aim54x on Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:00 am

I like the first, it is an interesting image, but yes the vignette is a bit overdone and the plant can be sharper.

#2 does not do much for me, there seems to be a lack of a focal point, my eyes wonder around and dont find anything to focus on. Maybe a different crop may help.

#3 is very nice, if you can reign in the blown highlight on her face it would be perfect! Great stuff!

#4 masterful balance of lighting here :up:
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques