Pulling Back

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Pulling Back

Postby stubbsy on Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:39 pm

I have a dilemma. I find the Sydney Opera House a tantalising mistress - everyone has had her yet she tempts me still :wink:

Last Saturday was no exception and the three images below all appeal to me. Trouble is I can't decide whether up close or pulled back a little makes for a stronger image. That's where you guys come in - tell me what image is the most compelling for you (or are all 3 just crap)

Opera-House/PRS2767/989374536_qePYC-O.jpg" class="postlink">Opera-House/PRS2767/989374536_qePYC-L.jpg" alt="Image" />


Opera-House/PRS2764/989379248_KJa3p-O.jpg" class="postlink">Opera-House/PRS2764/989379248_KJa3p-L.jpg" alt="Image" />


Opera-House/PRS2759/989373730_pdBNq-O.jpg" class="postlink">Opera-House/PRS2759/989373730_pdBNq-L.jpg" alt="Image" />
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Pulling Back

Postby leek on Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:59 pm

All three look good to me Peter, but the composition of 1 & 3 in particular seems to work well... Well done... You did well to find something not commonly seen.
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Re: Pulling Back

Postby fozzie on Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:01 pm

Hi Peter,

I personally prefer the third. Displaying strong lines of the 'Mistress' together with depth of the over hang of the high pitch shell. Looks like you are mastering the D700 :)
fozzie

When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Re: Pulling Back

Postby biggerry on Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:06 pm

Interesting shots Peter, al very similiar compositions and the ones that stands out, and only by a nose, is #1, there is a definite feel of patterns and juxtaposed lines (man.. I have sooo wanted to use that word for sooo long now :rotfl2: ) and I feel this is more prevalent in the first then the others.

All the images seem to have some banding in teh blue sky, or is that just my end?

I find the Sydney Opera House a tantalising mistress - everyone has had her yet she tempts me still


I could say something...but I had better not :rotfl2: :rotfl2:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Pulling Back

Postby wendellt on Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:27 am

i'll never get tired of shooting the opera house

the first image is the best by far because
1. It has alot of architectural element dimensions, the sweeping sails, the windows, the staircase and the foundation
all of these things you have framed with skill in 1 image

2. The angle it is taken at shows artistic flair and lots of thought. It also portrays the subject differently and it's not obvious that its the opera house.

3. the crop is great because unlike the 2nd image you have cropped out the metal bar at the right side that is out of place and destroys the synergy between all the elements

All i would do is desaturate the blue sky so its more like a darker grey blue to make it look more dramatic, the tone of the sky looks too vibrant and sort of unreal

the 3rd image is good but somehow the centering of the subject doesn't fondle the mind
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Re: Pulling Back

Postby petermmc on Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:28 am

No 1 stands out for me. The straightish lines of the bottom section reflect stability and the curve of the top reflects creativity. Nicely done. Sky is also beautiful. Might be interesting in B&W.

Peter Mc
Nikon & Olympus
User avatar
petermmc
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Figtree, Wollongong

Re: Pulling Back

Postby CraigVTR on Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:56 pm

wendellt wrote:2. The angle it is taken at shows artistic flair and lots of thought. It also portrays the subject differently and it's not obvious that its the opera house.

Wendell beat me to it. It is obviously architectural but unless you know the opera house it can keep you guessing.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
User avatar
CraigVTR
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland

Re: Pulling Back

Postby Matt. K on Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:35 pm

Peter
Both #1 and #2 work very well. The composition in #3 is a little weak because of the white mass on the bottom left hand corner. It weakens the image by dragging the eye down to that point.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Pulling Back

Postby ozimax on Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:01 am

I prefer #1. It could be any building, but it's the SOH from a unique angle. Very different and very nice.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Pulling Back

Postby aim54x on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:11 am

Another different point of view! I like!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Pulling Back

Postby gstark on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:25 am

Peter,

For me it's #1. Hands down.

First of all, it's somewhat misleading, as it almost looks like it could be a bridge of some sort, but it's also one that passes muster as something that EnergyPolice would approve of, as clearly, there's been little that you've done in post to achieve this outcome.

:)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Pulling Back

Postby Ant on Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:47 am

I have to agree with #1. I like 1 and 3 as a set though, you look at 1, wonder what it is, look at 3 and then the penny drops!
D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
User avatar
Ant
Member
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pm
Location: Lyndhurst, Melbourne

Re: Pulling Back

Postby colin_12 on Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:08 am

Peter this may not help but I prefer #1 and #3. Would hedge toward #1 more though. :up:
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: Pulling Back

Postby stubbsy on Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:40 pm

Thank you all for your comments.

biggerry wrote:All the images seem to have some banding in teh blue sky, or is that just my end?

I noticed that too Gerry. It's in the jpeg versions, but not the original. Nothing I could do could eliminate it so I gave up.

gstark wrote:it's also one that passes muster as something that EnergyPolice would approve of, as clearly, there's been little that you've done in post to achieve this outcome.

Well I did straighten it a little, but I think I'd pass muster with this one. :wink:

I've taken the advice on board and slightly reworked #1 to lighten and slightly desaturate the sky. Here's the result (it's also a slightly wider crop). As seems to be the consensus my preference is for #1 and then #3.

Opera-House/PRS2767/993708452_hM4ks-O.jpg" class="postlink">Opera-House/PRS2767/993708452_hM4ks-L.jpg" alt="Image" />
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques