Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by surenj on Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:31 pm
We had a overdose of aircraft at the Newcastle safari recently. I was lucky enough to borrow a 75-300 at short notice from a Flickr sundance forum. I have never used a lens longer than 85mm and this was certainly a very interesting experience. The lack of food and drink made my concentration waver and towards the end of the show... My main problem was that I didn't know much about the aircraft so couldn't appreciate the whole thing fully. Anywhoo... Here are some images for your critique.    
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by aim54x on Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:08 pm
I would have preferred the F111 to dominate the first with the flags smaller but I guess you cant get it all.....
#2 and #3 are great images of some nice formation flying......I'll bet that they put up a good show!
#4 is a nice snap, great lighting....ID on the plane type Gerry?
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:39 pm
not too shabby at all considering I could still hear that lens focusing after the aircraft had gone past Nice context on the first image, as Cam mentioned a bit more F111 and less flags woulda been nice, but still nice nonetheless. Nice work on the roulettes, good composition on the first, I would look at dialling down the exposure a bit to get a deeper blue in the sky - that however is a personal prference thing. Nice sharp shot in the last, you have done the lens justice! aim54x wrote:ID on the plane type Gerry?
L39 'Albratross' training aircraft - you can do joy flights in these since there are a number of civil service ones now (experimental category). I personally would not - getting in a clapped out 30 year old eastern block training aircraft ain't my cuppa tea 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by surenj on Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
aim54x wrote:I would have preferred the F111 to dominate the first with the flags smaller but I guess you cant get it all.....
Cameron, you wil have to wait for Peters images to see this... I believe he got a few. I was struggling to get anything in my viewfinder half the time! biggerry wrote:not too shabby at all considering I could still hear that lens focusing after the aircraft had gone past
Dude it was still trying to focus from two days ago, when I put it in my bag to take it back to the owner.  Nah seriously it was an adequate lens to get a feel for the whole thing. My keeper rate was high as I wasn't able to take a shot without focus + burst was a maximum of 4-5 RAWs.... biggerry wrote:Nice sharp shot in the last, you have done the lens justice!
Thanks! Although, It was a struggle to give context, show movement, scale etc.. just taking the photo of this sort of hunk of metal was kinda boring after a while...
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by aim54x on Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:04 am
surenj wrote:aim54x wrote:I would have preferred the F111 to dominate the first with the flags smaller but I guess you cant get it all.....
Cameron, you wil have to wait for Peters images to see this... I believe he got a few. I was struggling to get anything in my viewfinder half the time!
I can't wait! {quote} biggerry wrote:not too shabby at all considering I could still hear that lens focusing after the aircraft had gone past
Dude it was still trying to focus from two days ago, when I put it in my bag to take it back to the owner.  Nah seriously it was an adequate lens to get a feel for the whole thing. My keeper rate was high as I wasn't able to take a shot without focus + burst was a maximum of 4-5 RAWs....  [/quote] hahahahhaha that is some lens...focusing without power! Great to see that you enjoyed the trip out (pretty annoyed i didnt make it though). biggerry wrote:Nice sharp shot in the last, you have done the lens justice!
Thanks! Although, It was a struggle to give context, show movement, scale etc.. just taking the photo of this sort of hunk of metal was kinda boring after a while...
Not for a plane geek it wouldnt be boring!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by surenj on Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:51 pm
aim54x wrote:Not for a plane geek it wouldnt be boring!
Fair enough. aim54x wrote:(pretty annoyed i didnt make it though).
There is always next time. Although I don't know when there will be an Airshow. Maybe you will need to goto Melbourne for the Avalon show.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by stubbsy on Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:56 pm
surenj wrote:aim54x wrote:I would have preferred the F111 to dominate the first with the flags smaller but I guess you cant get it all.....
Cameron, you wil have to wait for Peters images to see this... I believe he got a few. I was struggling to get anything in my viewfinder half the time!
Hate to disappoint you guys. This is my best version - not a great image IMHO as the plane lacks detail: 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by aim54x on Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:16 pm
stubbsy wrote:Hate to disappoint you guys. This is my best version - not a great image IMHO as the plane lacks detail:
Thanks for sharing Peter. One thing bothers me a bit....the Pig's wing looks like it is infront of the flag pole....your not using some digital trickery are you?
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by stubbsy on Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:30 pm
aim54x wrote:stubbsy wrote:Hate to disappoint you guys. This is my best version - not a great image IMHO as the plane lacks detail:
Thanks for sharing Peter. One thing bothers me a bit....the Pig's wing looks like it is infront of the flag pole....your not using some digital trickery are you?
Cameron. While my photoshop skills are good that would be too difficult given the flame goes behind the flag as well. Interestingly some of the flame appears to be in front of the pole too, but I assure you this is real. If I was faking I'd have used a sharp, in focus F-111 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by aim54x on Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:38 pm
stubbsy wrote:aim54x wrote:stubbsy wrote:Hate to disappoint you guys. This is my best version - not a great image IMHO as the plane lacks detail:
Thanks for sharing Peter. One thing bothers me a bit....the Pig's wing looks like it is infront of the flag pole....your not using some digital trickery are you?
Cameron. While my photoshop skills are good that would be too difficult given the flame goes behind the flag as well. Interestingly some of the flame appears to be in front of the pole too, but I assure you this is real. If I was faking I'd have used a sharp, in focus F-111 
hahahahahahaha Must be a Shitma special effect 
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by stubbsy on Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:23 am
aim54x wrote:Must be a Shitma special effect 
Nope. This is a Shitma special effect: PS Suren - Apologies for the thread hijack. 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by surenj on Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:32 am
stubbsy wrote:PS Suren - Apologies for the thread hijack. 
No problemo Peter. That pasta definitely overrides this! BTW I love that last one! The fire is doing something funny though on the flagpole...  Is that due to diffraction?  Anyways it would be simple to fix if required.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by stubbsy on Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:02 am
surenj wrote:BTW I love that last one! The fire is doing something funny though on the flagpole...  Is that due to diffraction?  Anyways it would be simple to fix if required.
The flame on the flagpole is a diffraction effect I think. This last image is a fake (I photoshopped in the plane and the start of the plume of flame), but the flame around the flagpole is from the original (real) image that Cameron thought may have been a fake. Hopefully that makes sense. I think diffraction also explains why the original seems to show the plane's wing in front of the pole.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by surenj on Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:12 am
stubbsy wrote:I think diffraction also explains why the original seems to show the plane's wing in front of the pole.
I guess diffraction is much more prominent in the OOF areas? You are only using f8! stubbsy wrote:This last image is a fake
It would appear that you need to use PS to get a bad picture out of this lens! Seriously I think you are going to be fine in Antarctica with this lens... 
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by aim54x on Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:28 pm
hahahahaha good pic there Stubbsy!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|