Well, here's my first upload (edit - now 2 pics here)
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:47 am
Hi everyone.
Time to bite the bullet and share the fun I've been having.
Got my camera late December. Recent trip to Wineglass Bay in Tasmania, 1300 odd photos later in 3 days, doing the sorting and found this one that I was PARTICULARLY happy with.
This photo is as it was, no cropping, no photoshopping.
Downsized original photo to 800x531, resultant photo 66Kb.
Nitty gritty -
Focal Length 130 mm
F-Number F 4.2
Exposure Time 1/1250 sec
Metering Mode Pattern
Exposure Program Normal
ISO 200
Focus Mode AF-C
No exposure compensation
No flash
My own criticism - As I had junk on the camera sensor and couldn't get it sent away due to this pending trip, I was using a narrow depth of field, to reduce the evidence of black spot (none present in this photo). The result is the tail feathers perfectly focused but the wings slightly not. It doesn't detract from the photo at all - with the drops of water from the feet and the wave coming in, a fast shutter has probably served the photo better than slightly more depth of field to catch the wings clearer. What do you think?
Time to bite the bullet and share the fun I've been having.
Got my camera late December. Recent trip to Wineglass Bay in Tasmania, 1300 odd photos later in 3 days, doing the sorting and found this one that I was PARTICULARLY happy with.
This photo is as it was, no cropping, no photoshopping.
Downsized original photo to 800x531, resultant photo 66Kb.
Nitty gritty -
Focal Length 130 mm
F-Number F 4.2
Exposure Time 1/1250 sec
Metering Mode Pattern
Exposure Program Normal
ISO 200
Focus Mode AF-C
No exposure compensation
No flash
My own criticism - As I had junk on the camera sensor and couldn't get it sent away due to this pending trip, I was using a narrow depth of field, to reduce the evidence of black spot (none present in this photo). The result is the tail feathers perfectly focused but the wings slightly not. It doesn't detract from the photo at all - with the drops of water from the feet and the wave coming in, a fast shutter has probably served the photo better than slightly more depth of field to catch the wings clearer. What do you think?