Look up to the StarsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Look up to the Starsso... what do you think?
Star trail I did up at flat rock Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Look up to the StarsGreat shot. Love the colours and the cloud coming through at the angle. I must go outside after dark and try one of these myself.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Look up to the StarsLooks like a little light pollution may be at play! I had been taking BigV shots for granted. I had forgotten how difficult these are!
Do you have exif info for this shot Marcs? How did you know where to find the centre of the universe?
Re: Look up to the StarsThanks Craig
@ Suren, If I shared the exif, someone would kill me for my unorthadox settings. hahahahahah Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Look up to the Stars
I did notice the ISO 3200-7D type of chroma noise there... or is it ISO 1600? I sure hope those bands are not from the sensor...
Re: Look up to the Stars
Hahaha it's a 5D Mark II actually... at 1000 ISO to be exact. F4 I think...... and about 850". oh! and the 24-105 f4L at 24mm was the choice of focal length. There. Now shoot me. Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Look up to the Stars at least I got the Canon part right!
Thanks for the exif info Mark. How many batteries did you go through that night?
Re: Look up to the StarsWhat's the preferred method for star trails? Or what give the best results?
I've seen both long single exposure and many shorter exposures blended in post with some form of software.
Re: Look up to the StarsA fine start to this area of photography.
As to which method is better - that is determined by how much light pollution you are facing and how much noise your camera generates on long exposures. If you are in a light polluted area, then you will have to use short enough exposures that record the stars but not so long that the sky colour changes to that horrible brown/orange hue. In dark skies, the general rule of thumb is go as long as you can - easily 5 to 10 minutes will work. Light polluted area you may be restricted to 30 seconds as a max. Another hint do not use to high an ISO and use arounf F4 for good results. Stacking the frames to create the trails is easily done in PS and there are many examples of how to do this - google is your friend. Canon
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|