DSLRUsers.com

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:46 pm**

I quite like the second one. More of a vertical pano look and I love oversaturated images.

- beej

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:49 pm**

Darb

First one is better for me since, again, the second one looks unnatural. Maybe the trick is to make the greens darker, rather than more saturated and the water more purple?

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:02 pm**

how about ..

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:08 pm**

If you could do what you did with the last one and add a bit more left and right then i reckon you'd have it spot on

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:17 pm**

Sorry, but all of them look a little unnatural on my monitor... Not sure what you are trying to achieve :shock:

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:20 pm**

the first one is basically straight off the camera mate.

im trying to get a nice rich vibrant edit.

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:59 pm**

Darb

I think the third one is getting much close like Killa said

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:12 pm**

so comp wise you reckon a slightly wider crop ?

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:13 pm**

darb wrote:so comp wise you reckon a slightly wider crop ?

Yep

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:20 pm**

im sticking to a 12 x 4 aspect ratio so if i widen i also increase length ... the sky above the current crop is bright and ugly, so i guess i can put an extra couple hundred pixels of length along the bottom ... keeping the top where it is, if that looks unco tho im not sure

Posted: **Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:28 pm**

Darb, I think the problem ( if you could call it that ) With being so long the bottom bit of the water looks likes itls been duplicated from the top or mirrored.
I think Crop it 3/4 the way down

Sorry, it might be he booze talking :roll:

Is there rules on this Forum for Drinking & Posting :roll:

Mic.

DSLRUsers.com

ok another waterfall decision please!

ok another waterfall decision please!