Blue Mountains Waterfalls/StreamsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Blue Mountains Waterfalls/StreamsI think the poor members of DSLRusers are gonna be sick of waterfall shots soon
In a feeble attempt to minimise threadage I will include both venues water shots here Constructive critique more than welcome. The lower view of Empress Falls yep, that water looks cold and I can assure you it is. Another view of Empress falls some miscellaneous stream.. if your interested in the non-polarised shot; check out the water on the front of the filter in this one... gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Blue Mountains Waterfalls/StreamsOnly because it is the same sets of falls.........Cool stuff Gerry
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Blue Mountains Waterfalls/StreamsI think your streams shots really capture that lush wet feel of the location perfectly. I only wish I'd taken my tripod to the rainforest and taken some shots in the stream - not that we actually had enough time to shoot all the things that were readily available
Ray spent quite some time in the stream so I'm also keen to see what he got. D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Blue Mountains Waterfalls/StreamsGreat shots Gerry,
my favourites would be the waterfalls, lots to explore and I like the compositions. The stream shots are also very nice, super sharp but for me, they aren't as interesting as the waterfalls. An improvement for the first one, for an already really nice photograph, would be to try to get a bit more out of the shadows on the left, not too much, just a bit more detail, if you can. Great effort, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Re: Blue Mountains Waterfalls/StreamsI really like #1.
I find the foreground water in #3 and #5 a little distracting. It's lost that really white look to it. A crop without it might look better?
Re: Blue Mountains Waterfalls/Streams#1 and #3 for me! Love the deep reds in the rocks in #3
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Blue Mountains Waterfalls/Streams
Yeah well stop complaining and fix 'em Thats what the clone tool is for Good work on these as usual Did you find that with the polarizer that you lost some of the water movement effect ...dulled the white water somewhat if you know what I mean. Liking them a lot worth the paddle...any leeches I found it hard to keep the whites in the waterfalls under control but you've done well I've got a shot exactly like #3 ansd #5 and the jurys out on whether the whether the water movement in the foreground distracts from the principal component of the image. I'm thinking it does.
Re: Blue Mountains Waterfalls/Streams
yeah, that hour and half went real fast...I coulda stayed there for ages!
I did have a look at that, but I am pushing the limits on the sensor there - I really should have bracketed that shot. That said I will try and get just a fraction more detail out of it - I agree havng a little more detail would defintiely work better than a black blob!
I think we were actually spoilt with the quantity of compositions available, there was enough compositions in one set of falls to keep you occupied for hours.
hmm, interesting, I may take another look and see what can be done about the brightness of the water there since I like these compositions since they lead up to main waterfall..
ahh man.. that means I gotta open another program, thats a good 10 seconds taken outta my 5 minute limit and theres heaps of droplets...damn fine mist, we need a filter with a set of squidgy wipers on it...
yep, always does. it also makes for a different look on the wispy water effect, for example look at Garys waterfall shots and compare them to mine or Rodneys (who also had a CPL). Its a bit of a catch 22 really and it takes some trial and error to get used to it, I took some shots in the middle of that deep pool but they turned out very bland due to the lack of water movement (reflections) picked up by the CPL.
no leeches or ticks and no mozzie bites..a bit weird really I expected to come home with something... gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|