Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Reschsmooth on Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:26 pm
We spent a week down south at Malua Bay. Here are some images - the two of the trees appealed to me for their simplicity of line and colour. For this reason, I kept contrast low. Unfortunately, there was no third tree to complete my preferred series and possibly triptych.   Here is a pano of the beach - taken with the circular polarising filter attached which was a mistake realised after taking the images. Wrong time of day too - contrast is too high, but the clouds were what drew me to the image.  C&C appreciated.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by surenj on Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:52 pm
I quite like the trees. Perhaps you can zoom out a little to givem more breathing space? Your pano seems to have two vertical lines in the middle? 
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by PiroStitch on Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:28 am
I quite like the composition of the first tree, perhaps try a b&w conversion with lots of contrast to give it a different feel altogether.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Reschsmooth on Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:19 pm
PiroStitch wrote:I quite like the composition of the first tree, perhaps try a b&w conversion with lots of contrast to give it a different feel altogether.
Suren the tree images as presented are uncropped. My idea was to essentially take portrait shots of the trees. Here is a different take on the first tree, including B&W & Lomo versions. Interested in your thoughts. I note the vignetting on the Lomo version may be a bit strong. 
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by zafra52 on Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:44 pm
I prefer the first photo of the tree, but perhaps the top part of the sky could be a touch darker. I like its simplicity and the colour contrast. In fact everything in the image is serene and contrasts, which brings me to the treesome (sorry couldn't help myself). I believe it could work even better if you could accentuate their differences even more e.g. I would put the duotone image in the middle. It's a tho  ught!
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4855
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by Remorhaz on Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:25 pm
Also agree with having the monochrome in the middle - although I'm not a huge fan of the processing of the image on the right - perhaps just the bleached look without the vignette.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by surenj on Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:02 pm
Patrick, I really like the triptych idea!
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by biggerry on Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:41 pm
surenj wrote:Patrick, I really like the triptych idea!
I agree, however, how about using the other tree shot as the centre item and mirroring the other tree on the RHS? this creates the illusion of three different yet very similiar trees. This would make me look twice, atm its just squeezing out frames from the same image The pano has potential, but definitely needs more room on the lower side, polariser is not usually a complete show stopper however you do need to PP that side of the image. Those black bars are a bit off putting too, I assume they are artifacts in the stitching process?
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Reschsmooth on Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:23 pm
Remorhaz wrote:Also agree with having the monochrome in the middle.
I agree and it does look better, in my opinion.  And another version of the tree that I have been mucking about with.  What think you?
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by zafra52 on Sun Feb 27, 2011 5:31 pm
I like it!
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4855
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|