AlexModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
AlexHere are some shots of Alex that I loved - I really like the use of negative space with some portraits. I think it adds something that I can't put my finger on.
C&C appreciated. [not sure why smugmug is being a pain in the arse for linking photos, so using flickr. Hope they work] Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: AlexI'd like to see the first image cropped to exclude the black window...but retaining the window sill.
#2 is great as is Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: AlexIf you want the negative space in the first one, I'd suggest cropping out the entire window so that the only background is the wall.
The second one is great as is Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: AlexNice stuff Patrick, I am gonna say I like the window in the first - it adds a sense of balance to the image, for me it did not immediately draw my eye away from the subject, but rather they wandered there after looking at Alex. Also the fact that the window is black and this compliments nicely with the small amount of black showing of Alex's pants.
The second image, not particularly taken by the PP, but it could grow on me, standby on that. The LH foot looks too dark though, I would match it's 'lightness' to the other foot or close to, since it is in a shadow. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: AlexThanks for the comments.
I did leave the painting (commonly referred to as a window ) in the first to provide some balance, but will look at a cropped version. Gerry - I will try to fix up the left foot in the second. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: AlexPatrick - the element of space in the first pic (an excellent concept) fails through having the picture distraction. Remove it and you will have reached your goal
Both pics are excellent. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: AlexOk, I actually agree with you lot (except Gerry) and cropping out the dark section of the painting removes the distraction.
What do you think? [printing out on Harman Warmtone Paper is da goods] Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Alex
lol, I am sticking to my guns here, I like the picture frame! However at the end of the day its what you think, thats important thing - irrespective of the frame in or out its still a great image and will bring back fond memories in the future. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Alex
The other deciding factor is that the resultant crop is 8x10 to fit in a frame. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: AlexPatrick,
All three of these images are excellent, and with excellent use of negative space. Just to be different, I'm going to suggest yet another crop for the first. I would like to see this with just a small sliver of black from the painting at the top. I don't know if that will work, but I think it may give you the balance that you're seeking, without being too distracting. Certainly, this should be printed on warm paper (but cold would be brilliant too) but not at 8x10. That's way to small - go to at least 16x20 here g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: AlexGary,
I will try the alternative crop suggestion, although may have to do so without consideration of the 4:5 ratio (or otherwise crop more of the bottom). I would like to print bigger and may do so - I think I was lucky that day that the light, composition and pose by Alex just lined up nicely. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: AlexI love #2 - such a great candid.
Alex's expression in #1 is just beautiful. Sorry - can't add to the debate about the negative space. Go with your gut. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: AlexGreat photos and something i had never thought about.
I'm going to agree with Biggerry here and say that the picture frame (formerly known as the window) does balance the photo but is not too distracting. The frame is just out of focus so your eye is still drawn to the subject first. Then when you step back from the image you get that nice black balance as Gerry said. But I love the concept and will think about it next time i'm taking portraits. -Dave
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|