Botanical WonderlandModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Botanical WonderlandWell after a failed attempt at sunrise and sunset, I did have a pleasant walk around the Royal Bontanical Gardens after having a brief look at the Art Gallery and the Australian Landscapes 1970s-
This place always has a plethora of subjects, whether it be people, bugs, botanics or city scapes it never lets you down, I really should get there more often, the last time I was there was years and years ago. Anyway a couple of images that I would love to have some critique and thoughts on, all very everyday and mundane subjects but its always fun to try and make then interesting in composition and effect. how much does this look like some upmarket entre?! gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Botanical Wonderland#4 is a clear winner in my mind! Great freezing of the action and gets immediate interest to try and figure out what subject it is!
#1 I would have removed that green grass before taking the shot Yeah I know it wouldn't be allowed in the botanical gardens but I think I would be doing them a favour anyways... #2 is excellent tones and light here. #4 and #2 are definite canvas candidates. Blow em up!
Re: Botanical Wonderland #2 and #4 def canvas .... esp #2.....enlarge it and do it. looks gr8!
2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
Re: Botanical Wonderland#1 even before reading Suren's comment - remove the grass
#2 I reckon this might look better in monochrome (shapes not colour) D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Botanical Wonderland2 and 3 are great shots Gerry, but #4 is a corker.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Botanical WonderlandAmazing work as always Gerry!
Glad to see you made the most of what was a rather grey day Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Botanical WonderlandIts interestign how people like #4, that image does not really rock my world, I mean its nice and has a quaint effect with the high shutter and water droplets, but I feel it lacks a compelling composition to compliment the effect. I guess that slight mystery of what the subject is (nipple?NSFW) adds to it as well..
I do like #2, I have for some time wanted to get a nice green succulent image of one of these plants.
yeah prolly should have, did not even realise until I go home how much it stuck out like dog ...
I did consider this but had my heart set on a succulent green image
yeah, sometimes ya just gotta play it by ear, if the sky ain't playing then look else where - I reckon saying its too cloudly or wet outside is a cop out for not taking pictures gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Botanical WonderlandNice punchy images all round. I like the second one most off all and I have a very similar image in my library of images. I seem to recall running the Fractalius plugin over it too which was quite effective and an interesting result. If I can track it down I may well post a copy here if that's OK with you Gerry?
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Botanical WonderlandGerry
I love the tonal simplicity of #2 - it's just such a wonderful image. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Botanical Wonderland
by all means Geoff!, sorry I only just came back to this thread!
simple is something I overlook sometimes! thanks peter. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|