Remorhaz wrote:Is this that Bungan (SP?) place you were at once before? if so I think I preferred one of your shots from last time over these.
ahh yes, Dunbogan - no more jokes about the people that live at Dunbogan either...or else I will not get to that beach again..damn angry locals.
Remorhaz wrote:I like the second here except for that cloud on the left - normally I like cloud - but in this instance my first impression was that there was no separation on the left (leading to a kind of abnormal wave/water look on the left - kinda hard to explain sorry ).
I sorta understand here
Remorhaz wrote:I almost reckon you could crop off the right inch or so of the last image (to get rid of the tree in silhouette) - just seems a little heavy on the right?
Reschsmooth wrote:The third would be improved without the objects in the water at the left although doubt you could do much with that.
yeah this image needs some refining, I have reworked it. thoughts, better? I really liek this shot as a image but feel it is just not there yet.
Reschsmooth wrote:I like the first the best although would prefer calmer seas to give the rocks greater prominence and scale. Obviously your divine powers were off that day?
I probably could have achieved that since there was good variation in the wave action, there were plenty of sets when the water in this little bay was nice and calm - I did go into this shot with the sole intention of promoting the rock in the foreground, however as you mentioned there is certainly room to improvve there!
aim54x wrote:I love the flat water in #2, big ND action here?
nah, this was just polarizer and GND, however it was pre-dawn so it was pretty dark.
surenj wrote:#2 has very nice compo. The tones are not as strong as your previous ones. Do you have on with more prominent foreground with nice textured rock etc.
colin_12 wrote:I would certainly consider something like the first for a wall.
thanks colin!
FYI, here is a image that shows the little bay