DSLRUsers.com

It has been awhile since I have dragged out the Tokina 10-17 fisheye, but over the long weekend I did manage a few

I like the tunnel shot Cameron but it would be better if your mate was moving/walking

colin_12 wrote:I like the tunnel shot Cameron but it would be better if your mate was moving/walking

I'll try that next time...may want to bring my tripod for that one though!

The fisheye gives a great look. Like 1 and 2, think 3 would be a bit better if the rhs of the stadium roof was not cut off. I imagine you could not get back far enough to capture all of the roof.

I also like the tunnel...has this been defished? (or as Apple predictive text would suggest "fetishes"?)

Nice curves in all these cameron - doing the fisheye justice with that!

I agree about teh stadium shot, needed to be a fraction wider I reckon.

CraigVTR wrote:The fisheye gives a great look. Like 1 and 2, think 3 would be a bit better if the rhs of the stadium roof was not cut off. I imagine you could not get back far enough to capture all of the roof.

biggerry wrote:I agree about teh stadium shot, needed to be a fraction wider I reckon.

Yep...that 10mm Fisheye just wasnt wide enough for the Stadium....I was in a corporate box and I just couldnt get wide enough.

Reschsmooth wrote:I also like the tunnel...has this been defished? (or as Apple predictive text would suggest "fetishes"?)

Actually, the answer is no....I quite liked what happened with this image, the slight curvature could be the tunnel roof, or the lens... you decide!

biggerry wrote:Nice curves in all these cameron - doing the fisheye justice with that!

Thanks Gerry....It is such a pleasure to use, especially out at night when it gives you these distinctive six-pointed stars