Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by biggerry on Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:13 am
Well in hindsight i think we had half of the aussie photography forums represented at curl curl today, there quite a few keen beans out on the rocks today hoping for some good conditions. It was interesting with some good waves but a location i probably will not go back to..plus them rocks are slippery. The first 15 shots i took were utter shite, i just pointed the camera at something and hoped for the best. things improved slightly and there are actually some nice rocks and compos up around teh corner. Comments and critique, good bad ugly or indifferent welcome.    
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Remorhaz on Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:50 am
I quite like #1 - almost bigstopperish
#2 is very nice and probably my pick (did you HDR this?) - really nice gold flecks everywhere and the green nicely contrasts this. I sorta wish the sky could have been a little better but I'm still feeling it.
#3 is the sky I want in #2 but I prefer the composition of #2 much more
Not feeling #4 at all
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by aim54x on Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:59 am
The first looks very dramatic....and I do agree, very BIG STOPPER! I love #2, it does like HDR, but with you I'll have to wait to see what you say, because I do know what you can do with NX2. It wouldnt be your work without the trademark green stuff 
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by zafra52 on Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:49 pm
I like the first one best. It has a dream-like feel about it.
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4855
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by CraigVTR on Sun Jun 12, 2011 3:56 pm
#2 is a ripper, looks outa this world.
Craig Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
-

CraigVTR
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
- Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland
-
by biggerry on Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:12 am
Remorhaz wrote:I quite like #1 - almost bigstopperish
#2 is very nice and probably my pick (did you HDR this?) - really nice gold flecks everywhere and the green nicely contrasts this. I sorta wish the sky could have been a little better but I'm still feeling it.
#3 is the sky I want in #2 but I prefer the composition of #2 much more
Not feeling #4 at all
no big stopper that day  #2 is a single frame, no hdr and I hear you about the sky, but i am warming to it and its a bit different in my books. let me help you out with the feeling on #4 ..lets see..yep..it was cold and wet. cheers for the comments. aim54x wrote:I love #2, it does like HDR, but with you I'll have to wait to see what you say, because I do know what you can do with NX2. It wouldnt be your work without the trademark green stuff
yeah no HDR but a fair amount of shadow recovery and a GND filter (0.6) - nothign like some green action and it was awesome stuff there... zafra52 wrote:I like the first one best. It has a dream-like feel about it.
CraigVTR wrote:#2 is a ripper, looks outa this world. 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by surenj on Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:38 pm
I've had a few looks at these. I reckon it's nice to do that before you launch into critique.
#2 and #3 are the best IMO.
#2 is great spotting and execution and makes it look like an alein landscape to a certain extent. Very exotic and I certainly didn't see this perspective that day.
#3 although quite neat doesn't have the compositional strength from #2. The sky is better though.
#1 has slick composition which makes it an overall winner but not exotic like #2.
#4 is weak interms of composition. The movement makes it seem that there is camera shake. Perhaps it's an illusion.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by biggerry on Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:47 am
surenj wrote:#2 is great spotting and execution and makes it look like an alein landscape to a certain extent. Very exotic and I certainly didn't see this perspective that day.
#4 is weak interms of composition. The movement makes it seem that there is camera shake. Perhaps it's an illusion.[/quote] yeah its pretty crap really, i was trying to get the 3 layers, the rock/cement, pool and sky, however only one part (the sky) came to the party 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by redline on Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:33 am
i really like the second one, but i think a tighter crop of the the top half work better imo.
cheers
rl
-
redline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1370
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
- Location: Melbourne
-
by Sylvia on Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:00 pm
I like them all. Very nice set.
Nikons. Nikkor's.
-

Sylvia
- Member
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:46 pm
- Location: Central Coast
by dervish16 on Fri Jun 24, 2011 7:13 pm
Great photos Gerry. # 2 sticks out the most for me but I like #3 too. The rocks texture is so nice and looks like it's from a different planet.
-

dervish16
- Member
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:43 pm
- Location: Kiama Downs
-
by Geoff on Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:17 pm
This is one of my favourite beaches. I absolutely love the first one and think would look excellent big, and framed! Well done gerry!
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|