IR Panos

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

IR Panos

Postby aim54x on Thu Sep 01, 2011 10:51 pm

I ended up taking a few Pano's whilst I was up there with the IR camera. All have been stitched by Auto Pano Pro. I need feedback!

As always clicking on the image will take you to a 5000pxl across version

Converted to BW via Silver Efex Pro
Image

Converted to BW via CNX2
Image

RED/BLUE channel swap via CNX2
Image

RED/BLUE channel swap via CNX2
Image

RED/BLUE channel swap via CNX2
Image
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: IR Panos

Postby Remorhaz on Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:55 am

Hi Cam,

I'm not sure any of these are doing it for me. Nice landscapes and some interesting cloud action in #2 and of course this is just my very humble opinion and I've never done IR (so take this all with a very large grain of salt :)) - but...

I think I keep expecting to see dark blacks and really white foliage and clearly defined details if you know what I mean (kinda like the rocks and bright leaves at the left bottom of #2). I don't feel like they are IR, but more midtone monochromes and feel a little flat for me - I looked at all of them large and I liked #2 (but not the blown highlights in the clouds) and #4 (although perhaps not the kinda strange light blue clouds and bright spots) the best

#1 probably had the best contrast and I liked the patterns in the hills and valleys but for me it was too noisy and none of the details felt sharp or defined
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: IR Panos

Postby robert on Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:08 pm

My favourite is the second- though I think you need to bump contrast a fair bit, try and get the foliage to 'glow'. here is a real quick PS rework- let me know if you want it taken off, this looks a bit too contrasty but hopefully you get the idea.
Robert

Image
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Re: IR Panos

Postby CraigVTR on Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:11 pm

I have to agree, I do not think the IR landscape really works for me either. The mass of trees seem to be just a mass that lacks detail.
The stitching seems good and the compositions are good, but I would prefer colour. :)
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
User avatar
CraigVTR
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland

Re: IR Panos

Postby aim54x on Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:06 am

Thanks for all the feedback guys. I am certainly taking it all onboard, and will keep it all in mind next time I am out and about with the D80IR.

robert wrote:My favourite is the second- though I think you need to bump contrast a fair bit, try and get the foliage to 'glow'. here is a real quick PS rework- let me know if you want it taken off, this looks a bit too contrasty but hopefully you get the idea.


Robert I am really glad you have come out of the woodwork. I know you have some experience with IR and would love to get some tips from you. This is really a new adventure for me. I am not sure if my CWB is perfectly correct, hence I am not 100% happy with a lot of my false colour work. Do you reset your CWB everytime you shoot or do you keep the one that you have set? Also, with lenses, are you finding the focus confirmation dot coming up for you in your 300D? I have had an interesting experiences with my lenses (I am still testing my kit to find the best lenses for the job) but I have found that quite often I cant get focus confirmation (my D80 has been re calibrated for AF and it works a treat whenever I am trying anything close).

In post, I am finding that a lot of the images feel flat, and have been bumping contrast to battle this, obviously I am not being aggressive enough. What do you do? Curves?
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: IR Panos

Postby robert on Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:29 pm

I'll post in your other thread as more people might see it,
Robert
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Re: IR Panos

Postby aim54x on Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:51 pm

robert wrote:I'll post in your other thread as more people might see it,
Robert


Thanks!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: IR Panos

Postby surenj on Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:21 am

I've viewed #2 large and it's a tidy compo IMHO. Nice fore, middle and background elements and nice detail to hold interest. You will need more contrast on the midtones. Perhaps try D light! The highlights looks ok - perhaps slightly too bright. Printworthy I reckon. :cheers:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques