Melbourne by Day
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:34 pmSome more from the weekend.
The first is very cool and the second is not bad either.
With the first I think it could be warmed some - it looks a little cool to me.
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
https://d70users.net/
Melbourne by Day
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 10:34 pmRe: Melbourn by Day
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 11:03 pmRe: Melbourne by Day
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:37 amRemorhaz wrote:The first is very cool and the second is not bad either.
With the first I think it could be warmed some - it looks a little cool to me.
Thank you, I have warmed it up.
Re: Melbourn by Day
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 4:50 pmYes, I think I like the first and second too.
Were you using filters? I feel the colours
should havebeen more vivid in daylight.
Were you using filters? I feel the colours
should havebeen more vivid in daylight.
Re: Melbourn by Day
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:03 pmHe means 'Melbourne', by the way. 
Re: Melbourn by Day
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:20 amtjs001 wrote:He means 'Melbourne', by the way.
The forum thanks you.
Re: Melbourn by Day
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:50 amzafra52 wrote:Were you using filters? I feel the colours
should havebeen more vivid in daylight.
I only used a polariser, the pictures are a bit deceiving as it was overcast most of the time with scattered showers when all the day Yarra ones were taken (kept having to shelter under the bridge) For #2 it had been raining only 2 minutes before (we were sheltering under the bridge on which it was taken on) BTW Melbourne corrected
Re: Melbourn by Day
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:02 amChaase wrote: the pictures are a bit deceiving as it was overcast most of the time with scattered showers
Which part of "it was raining in Melbourne" do you think is a bit deceiving?
Sorry.
No I'm not.
Re: Melbourne by Day
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:20 pmgstark wrote:Which part of "it was raining in Melbourne" do you think is a bit deceiving?
That would be the bit where he said scattered showers
Re: Melbourne by Day
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 1:54 pmChaase, I hope I am not offending you with this but just using
the Auto tone in CS5 has improved the colours of your
image giving them a bit of vibrancy... I am sure you can do
even better with the original photograph.
pLease let me know if you want to remove your picture.
the Auto tone in CS5 has improved the colours of your
image giving them a bit of vibrancy... I am sure you can do
even better with the original photograph.
pLease let me know if you want to remove your picture.
Re: Melbourne by Day
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:21 pmzafra52 wrote:Chaase, I hope I am not offending you with this
No not at all, it's why I have "Edit photos OK" in my sig. It's the best way to learn
zafra52 wrote:the Auto tone in CS5 has improved the colours of your
image giving them a bit of vibrancy...
I did not even know that feature existed, I will have aplay this evening.
Cheers
Re: Melbourne by Day
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 8:32 pmDrop down the Image menu to find:
Auto tone
Auto contrast
Auto color
After appliying one of the above, you
can reduce de effect by dropping the
Edit menu and finding the Auto...
whatever effect you last applied.
It is very unsophisticate, but a very
simple way to improve some images.
Auto tone
Auto contrast
Auto color
After appliying one of the above, you
can reduce de effect by dropping the
Edit menu and finding the Auto...
whatever effect you last applied.
It is very unsophisticate, but a very
simple way to improve some images.
Re: Melbourne by Day
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:46 pmZafras edit has brought out the colors. Almost post card esque. Nice compo as well.