CrittersModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
CrittersCritters for crituque.....and ID if anyone can oblige All taken with the 60mm micro and R1C1.
I know this one is a fly, but can anyone narrow it down a bit more! Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
CrittersNumber 3 is a great shot of a Snail Parasite Blowfly. It's sometimes also called a Bluebottle.
--- I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-33.816840,150.953460 EOS 5D MkII, 70-200mm f/2.8LIS, 24-70mm f/2.8LIS, 50mm f/1.2, 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 IS, 580EX II
Re: CrittersThe first is a great shot. I agree it is a flightless female wasp waiting for a mate.
The second is one of the leaf eating beetles by the looks, wrong mouthparts for a bug. The fly seems to be suffering from lack of depth or a focus issue as the eye is not quite there. How are you finding the 60? I have not really put mine to it as yet. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: CrittersI agree with Colin on the IDs.
The first image is superb. It is nice and sharp where it needs to be. It could probably do with a little bit of lightening in the shadows. The second image is OK, but there's a certainly lack of sharpness, like movement or something. Perhaps it is diffraction, I'm not sure. The third images is pretty good but as Colin says, there's not enough DOF.
Re: Critters
Thanks all for the ID's and feedback. Yep agree the DOF on both the Leaf eating beetle and the fly are not quite there. All shots were handheld and I was trying to hold my breath while composing & manual focusing on the critters. The fact I have not nailed the focus is more than likely due to poor technique on my part and quite probably movement during capture. I need to practice some more, a lot more. The wasp was shot at f25, the beetle at f14 and the fly at f8. f16 and smaller is probably pushing it with macros of this type? I have the old 60mm D not the newer AFS version, It is a very sharp lens once you get the DOF right focus is slow and it does tend to hunt a bit. I use it as my go to portrait lens most of the time. Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Critters
I strongly recommend using a monopod or at least leaning the camera against something firm. It cam make a huge difference on nailing focus.
I have this lens and it is a great lens. I rarely shoot macro at any aperture larger than f/16. I usually go for f/22 and even f/32 (and sometimes even smaller than that).
Re: CrittersThey are very good! I'm jealous!
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|