Gangsta ReworkModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Gangsta ReworkI've been meaning to rework a portrait I took a few months ago with a specific idea in mind... I wanted to get your thoughts. Just a note that I've posted this in an international forum and got 'some' feedback so i've tried to improve upon it a little. So this is version 2.1.
Any hints, tips for improvements and any comments greatly appreciated.
Re: Gangsta ReworkI like the rework however feel the gun shot and glass fracture don't seem too realistic. I have no experience in such things but it looks less like a gunshot and more like a light of some sort. If ou know what I mean. Also there is no bullet?
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Gangsta ReworkI must admit that it doesn't work as a photograph
for me. It might as a graphic poster.
Re: Gangsta ReworkI quite like it. It is different and for that reason alone it works for me. Not sure how the effect has been achieved but well done for exploring.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Gangsta ReworkHey Suren, I reckon as a concept its great, the execution is also sweet as well. There is no doubt that its a manufactured image, this I like, there is no crossover, its not trying to be a complete realism, its a scifi/fantasy image.
I personally would look at mixing the clarity of the face in V1 with this version, i like the overall glass panel, the water drops etc in this version however that processing has left the face a bit muddled, now remembering that we are not portraying reality, i think having that clarity on the face from V1 would really engage the viewer with the person and not just the gun. good lateral thinking in my opinion. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Gangsta Rework
This is important as I can fix this very easily. I was trying to create seperation between the glass and the person; I was keen to create two worlds. His on the other side of the glass, and the viewer whose space has just been invaded by the shattering glass. Thanks Gerry for your detailed comments.
I think I might work on those a little more. Yeah, about that bullet. Does anyone have any I could borrow?.... I asked all the supermarkets and Kmart etc and they said they don't have any in stock...
Hi Zafra, I don't subscribe to the energypolice way of life.
Hi Geoff, this was done all in-camera + post processing = the photographic workflow. In hindsight, I should have just found a dirty window to photograph. It's so much easier to just photograph the damn things than to create them from scratch.
Re: Gangsta ReworkSurenj, I am sorry it you took offence at my comment,
but it was not intended. The fact that the special effects do not work for me and that I might prefer the original to this version doesn't mean it is bad. It means my taste is elsewhere. Some times we choose to cross the thin boundaries that exists between photography and graphic art. Some pictures are better as a graphic than as a photograph (this is a matter of opinion) as it happened when I turned the bullfighting photograph into a graphic to spare the possible sensitivity of the viewer. Some of you liked it and many didn't, and I respect that.
Re: Gangsta ReworkZafra,
I'd never take any offence to comments made here. Most of my comments are tongue in cheek and that's hard to convey in a forum. Thanks for your explanation and I value your comments.
Re: Gangsta ReworkThanks for your reply.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|