Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?Havent been around for a while for a number of reasons but did manage a recent trip to HCMC, Hoi An and Hue in Vietnam where I attempted to get up & personal with a few of the locals.
All taken with 24 -70 on D700 but with my preference being sports photography in the past, I really dont know how well these stack up as portraits. Any tips criticisms welcome. cheers R2
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?I do like the images, but I'm not at all keen on the treatments. My feeling is that the vignette should generally be used to help focus attention on the subject, but in these images, you already have a reasonably tight crop which achieves this, and the vignette isn't really needed.
And the last seems to have, perhaps induced as a part of your treatment, but more likely because it was shot in the shade (and it's therefore a wb issue) a strong blue cast. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?Thanks Gary..thats exactly the type of feedback needed as this is a whole new field for me.
I will wait for more fb and read up more on how to make these work without the vignetting/lomo effect. probably should have called them street shots really because all have been cropped from hand held shots. more cc welcome..and nice to be back. cheers R2
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?I don't mind the lomo effect in the last but feel, had it been feasible, a shift of the camera to the left would have improved the composition.
Agree with Gary regarding the vignetting and think a touch more contrast would have helped. I love the composition of the 2nd even though they eyes are close to the middle. The way the corners of the hat arc across the diagonal works, in my opinion. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?Geez who doesn't smoke in Asia?
Great portraits and all apart from the first are very strong images. Agreed that the vignetting should be removed as it was more distracting. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?I agree about the vignetting but I think the background on the first especially is a bit distracting. I would be inclined to darken the whole lot instead of just the edges.
__________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?I like them, but perhaps the others are right.
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?I agree with all the above comments about the vignett
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?I like the second (for me I'd have personally preferred to get the eyes more sharply in focus but that's probably a minor thing in reality). I agree with the comment about the structure of the image with the lines of the hat - very nice.
Agree about the wb shift in #4 and I reckon there's a bit of it in #3 as well - there's also something else odd about #3 (not just the heavy vignette) but I can't quite put my finger on it - it just doesn't look right for me. D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?Thanks all for the critiquing - I hope to get some time to work on them again over the weekend.
must admit I went overboard on the vignetting and PP. I'll take them back to the originals and see what I can come up with. Got to say taking them and meeting the people, albeit briefly, is still the best part! cheers R2
Re: Vietnam portraits - hit or miss?Wow,
Love the photographs (especially the second one), wish I had more time/confidence when talking to the locals to take their portraits when I was there last week. And that I had half the skill in execution to come up with such a wonderful set of photographs. Sorry, I'm not experienced enough yet to add any constructive criticism... Cheers, Dave. 550D 18-135/3.5-5.6
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|