A Couple of Old LocalsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A Couple of Old LocalsI've been trying to figure out this whole HDR thing these past couple of days. It's frustrating, especially with the wind of late, but I'm enjoying learning something new.
This was the original Hume Hwy crossing over the Goulburn River... And an old church from a small nearby town... I normally don't do much post and Photoshop/Photomatix are not my good friends yet, so any tips are most appreciated!
Re: A Couple of Old LocalsHi Adam, I'm not really a fan of the first - before I read that you were experimenting with HDR I instantly thought a little bit over the top HDR which I don't think suits this scene. NB: I'm not against HDR (I do it myself) but I find it hard to do "realistic" HDR with scenes like this (esp with lots of sky, foliage, etc) and tend to reserve it for scenes that suit the more hyper processed look. I think you've done well to get the sky to actually look blue (HDR often turns sky to grey) but I think it's the lower half - the reflection in the water where things go a bit awry.
The second I like - it still has a bit of the haloing going on but with the B&W I think it's working OK D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: A Couple of Old LocalsThanks mate. Here's something with a little less colour...
I wasn't really going for the realistic HDR look in this case. I've done that in the past reasonably successfully and I'm also a big fan of the realistic look, but this time I wanted more of a hyper-realistic (if you will) look. Lately I've been spending a lot of time looking at the works of Klaus Herrmann, Anthony Gelot and Trey Ratcliff. Pretty much all of those images are obvious HDR, but they appeal to me. They're all clearly masters of the craft and mine and terrible in comparison, but it gives you an idea of the direction I was heading, or trying to head at least.
Re: A Couple of Old LocalsI definitely prefer "realistic" version 2...but it certainly not the "hyper realistic" look that you were after, if you stick with it for long enough i am sure you will master that look as well.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|