A castle, a canyon and another castleModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A castle, a canyon and another castlePutting up a small selection from my recent hike in the Czech countryside. The smaller web dimensions of the canyon images really don't do it justice. It's going to be another one where I'll be printing it large in the future.
Karlstejn Castle A man's home is his castle Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: A castle, a canyon and another castleWayne,
Please tell us more about the scene photographed in the second and third images here. In both of these images, I think I'd like to see the contrast bumped a little; I don't think the conversion is quite "there" yet. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: A castle, a canyon and another castleThanks Gary. The second and third images are of a limestone quarry. It's been a challenge of late with my b&w conversions as what I see before saving it as a JPG is a different and has more contrast. Back to reworking it some more.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: A castle, a canyon and another castleThat last image is sublime in my opinion, looks like it was taken in the 70's. well done.
The BW ones do nothing for me and come across very flat (depth wise) - its very interesting to see a quarry like that which has been dis-used for some years and hence the trees etc at the bottom.. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: A castle, a canyon and another castle#4 is nicely composed but the light is relatively flat. Minor improvement could be slightly higher perspective (easier said than done I guess) so that the shrubs are not obscuring the house. Beautiful scene though. Perhaps a nice place to retire. [as long as the temperature is in the 20s]
Is that purple cast natural? The BW conversions IMHO have too many confusing textures.(looks like a haphazard HDR BW conversion) I reckon color may help to distinguish between trees, shrubs, stones etc. It looks soft but if you click through, it's much better. hth.
Re: A castle, a canyon and another castleI love the colours in the first two - I am not an expert on colour negative film, but it has the look of Fujicolor Pro 160. Very nice.
The B&W have less appeal for reasons already given. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|