Melody in greenModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Melody in greenAs I have been explicit with remarks on Matt’s pics I thought I would give him a chance to hit back
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Melody in greenISO 1638400 perhaps
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Melody in greenI'm not sure about this one. Perhaps, it would
work better in B&W and with less noise?
Re: Melody in greenI am not sure of the noise, but everything else is spot on. Exposure is great and there appears to be no wide angle distortion.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Melody in greenThanks guys - I must admit that I added the noise to soften the rather harsh looking foot. Maybe a soft focus approach would have been better.
I did not convert to B&W as the whole purpose of the shot in the first place, was to emphasise the green. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Melody in greenActually, four meters away from the monitor
doen't look that bad...
Re: Melody in green
I tried it at 4cm and got spots before my eyes Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Melody in greenHi Chris,
This version is dominated by the post processing etc. My overall feeling is that the light etc is not that nice and the foot itself (with that vein) doesn't lend itself to a nice melody. Could you show us the original?
Re: Melody in greenChris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Melody in greenThanks Chris. IMHO the original is miles better in terms of composition, sharpness and context. Only nitpicks are a quick toe nail trim and getting rid of that vein.
Re: Melody in greenChris, I must say you keep your feet in exquisite condition. You should wear open heels more often.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Melody in green
You should see my collection of dresses Patrick Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Melody in green
As long as I don't have to see you in hose... Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Melody in green
That will take care of those toes/toe nail and vein...
Re: Melody in greenChris
Curious image with some very interesting compositional elements. The image, a foot in a high heel shoe, has added digital grain and or noise to imitate the pointillism style of painting .Georges Seurat would have liked this one. He also would have liked that you have used very high tech binary means to achieve what he he did with paint brushes and pigments. The image has quite a bit of dynamic energy in that the weight of the foot can be easily imagined, and this is reinforced with the well executed perspective of the floorboards that lead the eye and seem to exagerate the images weight. The placement of the 4 nails in the image space is a master stroke as they help stop the eye at a critical junction , or the main point of interest being the toes and bow of the shoe. The horizontal cut of the floorboard brilliantly supports this function. I see the top of the image as being the weakest part of the composition and find the ankle has been cut to low, destroying part of the aesthetic of the image. Personally, I don't find the image pleasant to look at because of the somewhat unpleasant colours, IE, the puce greens and confetti coloured skintones but have no doubt that some viewers will. Is it art? Not in its present location...but if you printed it on high quality paper and exhibited it quite large on the neutral coloured wall of a high class gallery....then that's what it probably would be. Do I like it? No. Regards Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|