Super Moon

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Super Moon

Postby surenj on Tue May 08, 2012 7:24 pm

Thanks Gerry for organising this one. Apparently a few hundred others also heard that the moon was going to be big. Honestly, I wasn't that impressed. :wink:

Also thanks Cath (and Rodney who suggested it) for lending me the x1.4 which was nice with the 70-200.

Here are a few for your C&C. I found it exceedingly hard to 'correct' the blown moon as I planned to do in some pics.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

I've violated the 5 image rule just to squeeze in one more. :surrender:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Super Moon

Postby ian.bertram on Tue May 08, 2012 9:29 pm

I really like images 2 and 4. Image 2 because the moon is clearly resolved and you have the iconic Opera House with the iconic moon, and image 4 because it is exquisitely lit and is a different take on a very overtaken image. Image 3, if the moon was similar to image 2 would also be an absolute winner.
User avatar
ian.bertram
Member
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:35 pm
Location: Panania, South Western Sydney, NSW

Re: Super Moon

Postby Remorhaz on Tue May 08, 2012 10:25 pm

Hi Suren I like #2 although I'm not sure yet about the moondrop hanging off the end of the sail - I've got some in my library of the moon partly peeking up above the top of the sail but was unsure about processing them.

#1 and 3 are just too nuclear - it might as well be a shot into the sun, you can't tell - this is where I had to bracket to try and salvage detail both in the moon itself and the environment (be that sky or the SOH) - it was dark esp after twilight so the EV difference was much too great (even 4 stops apart starting at -6EV was nowhere near enough - in hindsight I should have done images at -7 or -8EV plus 0EV and maybe something else inbetween to blend)

#4 is also nice but I'm not sure it warrants that much water at the bottom

#5 is a neat look - didn't you shoot this vertically?
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Super Moon

Postby surenj on Mon May 14, 2012 11:48 pm

Thanks for your comments.

ian.bertram wrote:Image 3, if the moon was similar to image 2 would also be an absolute winner.

Thanks Ian. Unfortunately I don't have nicely exposed version of that one without the moon being too nuclear. I might have a few brackets and think about how to salvage a couple of pictures.

Remorhaz wrote:#2 although I'm not sure yet about the moondrop hanging off the end of the sail - I've got some in my library of the moon partly peeking up above the top of the sail but was unsure about processing them.

Fair call. I was hoping that the 'step' would cause curiousity and make the eye linger longer at the intersection then to slowly follow to the right side of the image.

Remorhaz wrote:#1 and 3 are just too nuclear

Yeah, I found it really hard to adjust the moon without causing a halo and dark ring around it! Here is an attempt.

Image
Sydney Opera House Moonrise May 2012-6607.jpg by http://www.flickr.com/people/surenj/, on Flickr
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Super Moon

Postby Remorhaz on Tue May 15, 2012 9:41 am

surenj wrote:Yeah, I found it really hard to adjust the moon without causing a halo and dark ring around it! Here is an attempt.


Thats better - can't see much of a dark ring, is that some sort of spotlight beam on the bottom left?
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Super Moon

Postby biggerry on Tue May 15, 2012 1:22 pm

I am struggling to get excited about moon shots from that day, i think i have moon fatigue :roll:

I like the fourth one and agree it needs less water on teh bottom, it looks alot like one of Cath's images (and probably half of sydneys' as well) which i think was one of the better compositions from teh night (post moonrise anyway).

I like the last image, something different and the repeating patterns appeal to me.

In terms of the moon shots, you really need to HDR them to get any detail - for me i would rather just plonk a moon in the scene, thats about the same level of processing from my end. Reality does not factor in for me with the moon :wink:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques