Star Trails over Sydney City and Harbour...

[Remorhaz]

After my wildly successful first attempt at Star Trails out in the country on a clear star filled night it was time to up the ante and attempt one in the heart of the city.

This basically breaks one of the cardinal rules of good star trails - getting away from light pollution - taking the image facing the heart of the CBD where light pollution will be at it's peak is somewhat risky

Kath and I headed down to Balls Head Reserve on the northern side of Sydney Harbour where you can get a good view across the harbour with the Sydney Harbour bridge and Opera House on the left, Sydney's CBD skyline in the middle and Darling Harbour across to the Anzac bridge to the right. The evening wasn't looking promising from the start with the sky filled with light stringy clouds and the haze from burn off which were likely to reflect the light back down from the city (which they did). So at least it looked promising that we'd be doing nice colourful sunset shots instead (which as it happens also conspired not to happen with a pretty uneventful sunset).

We setup for the star trails anyway and a quick check of the iPad astronomy app showed Sigma Octanis (the centre of the star rotation) to be somewhere just to the right of Darling Harbour for us. We took a number of twilight images to use as the base for the city and water in our final image (I used a 3 stop hard grad ND over the sky for these).

We then switched to star trails mode and reversed the grads in an attempt to block out the light from the lower half of the image (basically from the top of the buildings down) - I stacked both my 2 and 3 stop hard grads for this. It was then a bit of trial and error to get an exposure for the star trails shots and this is when the problems really began...

In the country I used 60 second exposures at f/4 and ISO 1250. In the city I tried 30 second exposures at f/4 and ISO 1600 which resulted in a nuclear wasteland - basically the entire sky was just pure white. I tried a number of exposures but everything resulted in washed out sky - even my final selection of 25 seconds at f/4 and ISO 800 was looking very very grim on the LCD - any shorter and I was not going to capture any motion of the stars and any lower ISO and I might not register any stars at all. Those damn clouds and crap in the sky (and the 8:30PM fireworks display at Darling Harbour probably didn't help ) were just reflecting the city light back at us and blocking out the stars.

We were there anyway so we decided to just give it a try and set the intervalometers off on their task. I setup for 399 shots (almost three hours worth) from 6:10PM and even the shots at the end looked disastrous.

Luckily we'd both also brought second camera bodies and Kath had brought the full light painting arsenal so we spent the next three to four hours experimenting with light painting in the grassed area next to where we'd setup for trails whilst we were waiting for them to complete. Will post some of those in a follow up thread when done.

As it happens the camera managed to capture some star trails far better than I had expected and at least a few really bright stars managed to register through the light and clouds - still not a patch on my efforts in clear unpolluted sky - but the end result after blending with the twilight exposure turned out far better than I had hoped.

[Matt. K]

What a wonderful result. Very unique image.

[surenj]

Super duper Rodney!

Did you have to handpick the ones to blend?

Shaving a little off the bottom may work as well.

[CraigVTR]

Fantastic effort.

[surenj]

On second and third look, I think the paucity of the trails work quite well to give equal standing to the city and overall balance of the image. I might even be tempted to liquify the bridge columns to make them straight.

[bigsarg7]

i am very impressed, i think u have done an amazing job, great work and thumbs up for trying, succeeding and staying out in the cold for so long!!

[biggerry]

Nice one Rodney.

[ATJ]

Very impressive! Light pollution? What light pollution?

[Remorhaz]

Super duper Rodney!
Did you have to handpick the ones to blend?
Shaving a little off the bottom may work as well.

Handpick? do you mean the twilight shots or the star trails ones.

I only used one twilight shot to blend with and I used all of the star trails ones stacked (I didn't look at them I just stacked the whole 399 of them and used the end flattened result - you can't really take out any of the trails exposures (except the start or end) otherwise you end up with gaps)

On this and another suggested I received I cropped both the left and bottom - removing the half bridge and putting the city near the lower left third and the centre of the trails somewhat near the top right third - what do you think?

[ATJ]

I think it needs the bridge to be Sydney. Otherwise it's just any old city.

[Mr Darcy]

I think it needs the bridge to be Sydney. Otherwise it's just any old city.

[Bob G]

That's great work Rodney.

Well thought through and well executed.

[PiroStitch]

Love this series - definitely something different to the standard images of Sydney

[amashun1]

Very nice picture mate, that makes me want to try it now

[blacknstormy]

Love it - the first composition really adds to the shot - gives a sense of place - Love it !!

[Remorhaz]

I think it needs the bridge to be Sydney. Otherwise it's just any old city.

:agree:

Love it - the first composition really adds to the shot - gives a sense of place - Love it !!

Thanks Fella's - hadn't thought of that

That's great work Rodney.Well thought through and well executed.

Love this series - definitely something different to the standard images of Sydney

Very nice picture mate, that makes me want to try it now

Thanks - I hope to try another somewhere on the harbour next month if I can (maybe somewhere closer to the bridge) - depends on timing and weather I guess