/_\ Triangles /_\Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
/_\ Triangles /_\I was gonna wait for tuesday to make it Triangle Tuesday but i probably woulda forgotten by then.
It was meant to be a stunning sunset with amazing colours and sweet cloud movement...but all i got was pea soup - I could not find that option for pre-booking per ticketek per the usual, thoughts? ambivalent, good, bad, fugly? gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: /_\ Triangles /_\I like the first - the clean sky makes the structure more prominent. I would crop about 10-20% from the top.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: /_\ Triangles /_\Some nice triangles those are. I would agree with a trim of #1
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: /_\ Triangles /_\A bit dark (overall) for me
Looks kinda desaturated - but not - so perhaps go the whole way and go monochrome? D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: /_\ Triangles /_\I am not sure they appear too dark for my liking
on my screen. I think they need more light.
Re: /_\ Triangles /_\Hmm...perhaps one more element to tie it in together. A vulture would be nice. Or perhaps an airplane.
Re: /_\ Triangles /_\
hmmm, food for though, i see where you are coming from, my initial intention was for a more dramatic sky, however in hindsight less sky would be desirable.
I don't mind the darkness, i feel it suits the scene, monochrome would work - desaturation is just something I am playing with atm
I am seeing a theme here..maybe they are really too dark
plenty of planes a vulture would be cool too - i wonder if I can order that thru ticketek also gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|