Untitled...

[Geoff M]

Untitled because I can't think of one!

I quite like this one but not sure why, anyone else feel the love?

[Matt. K]

Interesting image....but, I'm having a problem with your signature/logo that takes up so much space and is distracting. I understand the need to protect images and make it difficult to copy or steal them but in the case of this image a quick crop and your sig is gone....so maybe play it down a little so we can see the image as it was meant to be seen.
As for the image....Excellent! Somehow , it looks like a graphical construction...it has those elements.

[Geoff M]

Thanks Matt, I will look at the watermark issue. I normally use one with a bit more opacity but alas I picked the wrong one when exporting from lightroom on this occasion. I started adding watermarks after I had an image 'stolen'.

[aim54x]

I really like this...love the lines and the shadow play!

[zafra52]

The image is a bit too dark on my screen and
the signature needs to be moved someehere
more discreet because it is not the subject
and interferes in that position.

[sirhc55]

I agree with Matt. I could remove the imprimatur in about 30 seconds so it really is not necessary to have it in this position. A copyright imprimatur can be as low as 10% tint and around 6 point. It would be virtually unseen but under magnification it would most certainly be seen.

As to the image, I love it.

[Remorhaz]

Yep - diggin' the shadows

[biggerry]

I am warming to it, i have had a number of looks at it to try and figure out what bugged me about it. For me, I reckon if you crop 20% off the right and bottom it would be a much better image, this would bring the frame into play in a more prominent way and provide a visual contrast within the frame that may hold the viewer for longer.

It goes without out staying the watermark is too in ya face. If you are concerned about unauthorised downloading, maybe consider the full image watermarks at a much lower opacity.