Norfolk IslandModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Norfolk IslandI recently went on a week long photography workshop with Mark and Michael from Treakabout Photography. Had a great time, with great tuition, conversation, locations and photo opportunities. Here are a few samples from the week.
Early morning storms at Cemetry Bay Red Tailed Tropic bird trying to land A more colourful sunrise at the Bumboras Take my photo too, pleeeeeese. Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Norfolk IslandNice Craig, I am partial to the two seascape shots and applaud you for taking the 2/3rd skys option since it is a quite a difficult composition to nail, I think in both these you could make a stronger image by opting for a slight pano crop to center the horizon. I don't think in both that sky is epic enough to want such a large portion of teh fram. The second seascape is (for me) let down by the almost black hill, this is at odds with the nicely exposed foreground and suggests pretty heavy GND filter, in in any case it really jumps out at me.
I have found that manually blending a couple of exposures (even when you have used a GND) can help when there is not a defined flat horizon hence resulting in unevenly lit hills/rocks etc. In the last duck/goose (or whatever they are) image I see what your going for and with a caption (as you have) it works well, however for anything else I reckon barry needs to be cropped the hell out gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Norfolk IslandGreat images...like Gerry I am very partial to the two seascapes.....I dont really have much more to add to what Gerry has pointed out either.....
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Norfolk IslandCraig - I really like the first - those tones of blue (esp the bright swathe through the water) are really nice. I mostly concur with Gerry's assessment and can only add that like the second seascape I would have perhaps liked a touch more detail and light on the rocks on the left. I like the idea of the brid in the second but I just don't think the wings were in the right position for you in this shot - can't fault nailing the focus and dof on this one tho.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Norfolk IslandThanks for the comments guys.
Here is a different crop of #1 A different crop of #3 to remove the dark headland as I do not have another exposure with more detail that I could blend. The dark headland was my only disappointment with that shot, I did try to bring out detail in the raw file but the info was just not captured. I have many more shots of the Tropic birds and will post some up in the next few days. The geese shot was just for the photoboming laugh. Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Norfolk IslandExcellent images with #1 and #2 the standouts for me. I don't mind the dark headland in the first image. I think it's just perfect! The second image puts me right next to the bird, I feel like I'm flying! Seascape #3 lacks an eye hook in the foreground which would have improved the image a great deal.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: Norfolk Island
Hi Craig - I believe I prefer seeing the whole tree in the first so I prefer the original crop myself D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Norfolk IslandI prefer the two landscapes, but that's me.
Re: Norfolk IslandHey Craig, just some food for thought on the processing of the two seascapes.
The big tree is a problem, as Rodney mentioned, having it cutoff looks a bit strange, however its probably a choice of lesser evils. On the other one, I think a square crop maybe in order. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Norfolk IslandThanks Gerry
I like the square crop idea and can you tell me how you pulled more detail out of the pano crop, was it global or selective lightening? Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Norfolk Island
Hi Craig, for the pano one I did both global and selective (u-point) shadow recovery, there is quite a lot of detail there even on the jpeg, hence I think you could a better job with the raw version. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Norfolk IslandI really like #4. Great angle and sharp as a tack.
What purpose do the red tails on the bird serve ? EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Norfolk Island
Thanks I cannot find any reference to the purpose of the tails but I do know there are white tailed varieties in different parts of the world. Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|