Simple Floral Macro...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Simple Floral Macro...Some flowers in my dads garden with the Nikon 105VR macro - no focus stacking, no macro ring lighting, no flash, no tripod this time - just basic handheld run and gun
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Simple Floral Macro...For me the last image has a grace that the others don't have. It's the sweeping lines and the simple composition that lift it a notch from just any ordinary old flower shot. The others are brash and loud and rely on rude colours that shout and scream. Convert them all to B&W and it's the last image that will hold its spot on the wall.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: Simple Floral Macro...
Thanks Matt - that reaffirms my own thoughts - looking at my star ratings in Lightroom I had the last as my own favourite with a follow on soft spot for the first. Your thoughts however on that leaf blade and partial flower in the bottom left corner?
I must admit I hadn't even thought of converting any of these to monochrome - here's a rendition I put together... D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Simple Floral Macro...I think what Matt was getting at is that the last image had the stronger compositional elements, rather than suggesting that any would be best in b&w.
Often a good test of any image... take away the colour and see if the structural elements can stand on their own. Oh... and I would agree that that last image is the keeper... and yes you could tweak the bottom left area without much trouble, it may well improve it overall, although I'm not too much troubled by it. Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|