Page 1 of 1

Faces

PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:01 pm
by Geoff M
Image

Image

Re: Faces

PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:11 pm
by Matt. K
I'm impressed with the technical quality of #2! When I first saw the post I'd just finished rubbing my itchy eyes and thought the title was 'faeces'. :biglaugh:

Re: Faces

PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 8:36 pm
by zafra52
The second is good enough for a commercial, but I prefer the humour of the first one...patiently awaiting their cruel fate!

Re: Faces

PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:29 pm
by Geoff M
Matt. K wrote:I'm impressed with the technical quality of #2! When I first saw the post I'd just finished rubbing my itchy eyes and thought the title was 'faeces'. :biglaugh:


That's funny! As long as you don't say that about my images :nono:

Natural day light used for them both, no artificial lighting or flash used.

zafra52 wrote:The second is good enough for a commercial, but I prefer the humour of the first one...patiently awaiting their cruel fate!


The first is the result of letting your daughter get her own lunch!

Re: Faces

PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:00 pm
by ozimax
The first is awesome. Cheery tomato or radish? I can't believe these are just natural light.

Faces

PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:17 pm
by Geoff M
ozimax wrote:The first is awesome. Cheery tomato or radish? I can't believe these are just natural light.


Cherry tomato. Just noticed you typed Cheery tomato was that intentional?

They are au natural.... honest.


Geoff

Re: Faces

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:05 am
by ozimax
Geoff M wrote:
ozimax wrote:The first is awesome. Cheery tomato or radish? I can't believe these are just natural light.


Cherry tomato. Just noticed you typed Cheery tomato was that intentional?

They are au natural.... honest.


Geoff


Cheery cherry tomatoes. Yes, it was a typo. :D

Re: Faces

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:20 pm
by claystevens
I prefer the #1. And can't find a face in the #2. Some problems with me?

Faces

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:18 pm
by Geoff M
claystevens wrote:I prefer the #1. And can't find a face in the #2. Some problems with me?


Just a watch face, nothing more sinister!


Geoff