More BirdsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: More BirdsHave you applied a vignette to this image?
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: More BirdsExcellent photo Tony. Beautiful.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: More BirdsWould make an outstanding Ozzie postcard. Perhaps back off the vignette just a tad.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: More BirdsGary said:
Do you mean a ....vinaigrette? Regards
Matt. K
Re: More BirdsI like it.
Re: More Birds
Radial Filter in LR
Re: More Birds
Thanks. I think (if that's the effect I'm seeing) it should be pulled back a little. It actually looks to me as if, were this being done under an enlarger, the centre section of the image had been held back during exposure of the paper, either to lighten the main subject, or darken the edges. I'm not convinced that it's needed, and I don't think that it helps this otherwise great image. Perhaps cropping more tightly, removing some of the space from the top and left edges of the image might be worthwhile? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: More BirdsI think for this kind of image a more even exposure across the frame is fine, mainly since the BG is clean and does not draw the eye away, hence no need to funnel the viewer using vignetting.
i would crop it to get the branch to intersect the corner and tighten the view up a bit. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: More BirdsHaving had another look at this pic I find it interesting in that it illustrates 1 of the 'faults' in composition that I used to teach to students. That is, if you have 3 dark corners in an image then the image will tend to 'bleed' out of the light corner. Your image is an excellent example of this in that you have 3 dark corners but the bottom left corner has not been darkened. To reinforce the eye being led out of the image space the viewers eye moves along the diagonal branch to the uppermost bird, which is looking down into the bottom left corner. This leads the eye out of the image space....although in this image the effect is very subtle and does not degrade the quality of the image too much. As an experiment you might like to darken this bottom left corner and lighten the opposite, (top right corner), which should have a slightly counterbalance effect and push the eye back into the image space. Worth a try? It's a great way to discover the power of the different elements in a composition, remembering that the aim of strong composition is to lead the eye around the critical elements of your subject, but never OUT of the image space.
Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|