OpinionsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: OpinionsThe image has some lovely elements but lacks a focal point....something for the eye to lock onto. Perhaps something or somebody in the foreground would have provided this....IE a dog running in the sand or a piece of driftwood.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: OpinionsMatt has raised a good point about the focal point, however for me the image lacks continuity, the line of the water acts a nice lead however its sends the viewer out of the frame since its cutoff at both sides. The sun is a nice anchor point and more so for this BW however, it also sends the viewer crashing out the right hand side of the frame due to the fact its placed soo close to the edge.
In hindsight (bearing in mind I have never seen this spot) I would have considered a wider panoramic option, capturing the curve of the water on the left (as it leads around to the headland) such that the viewer could move from the bottom right to the left side then back across to the bright sun. The sun would also be better placed at the intersection of the top right hand side third. I think with the wider view you could get away without having a strong focal point ie log in the foreground. HTH. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: OpinionsBearing in mind what it has been said above, I believe the focal point is the sun. Bu, I agree that it needs something else.
Re: Opinions
Thanks Matt,
This was taken in 2006, at that time I was using the kit lens only. Thanks very helpful and I agree with then and the same with Matts comment.
Thanks Zaf, your comments add weight to the previous comments. The trouble with your own work its hard to see it sometimes for what it is. I have shown this to a couple of people and they have liked it, but I was not, at all sure about it. It good to get good feedback, so thanks.
Re: Opinions
A shark? President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|