Urban LandscapeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Urban LandscapeThe mulitlayers in this image make for a complex composition that would be beyond my ability to disect. Glad you saw the potential in this.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: Urban LandscapeWith that building in the lower rh section of the image, I'd like to see the freeway removed in post so that we can see the whole of that building. Yeah, nah.
What Matt said; well spotted. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Urban LandscapeThank you gentlemen. Several people found this image puzzling and I understand why. Everything in the image is equally sharp, the furthest and the closest objects. Therefore what the eyes see confuses the brain initially. It's a bit like those images that show either a young woman or an old lady.
I took the photo from the Brisbane City Hall's tower towards Roma Street station. The reason I like this picture is because it reminded me of traditional Chinese paintings. In those paintings the artist tried to paint three dimensional landscapes in a canvas with two dimensions getting this type of vertical perspective. Once your brain decodes the basic fact that your eyes are looking at a depth of field with a two dimensional perspective the urban landscape becomes mundane, I think.
Re: Urban LandscapeGreat photo Zaffs. This one is definitely doing my head in!
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Urban LandscapeNot mundane Zaff. A wonderful example of modern urban sprawl that will be of interest to future generations when they forensically disassemble the causes of the collapse of society and the environment. We should have opted for a village life.
Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|