Capturing bird in flight

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Capturing bird in flight

Postby yeocsa on Mon Apr 11, 2005 12:14 pm

Trying out to capture birds in flight. D70, Nikon AFS 300 F4. Handheld.

Image

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Apr 11, 2005 12:16 pm

Arhtur - it worked - I really like the contrast between the land and the water :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby xorl on Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:28 pm

Nice capture. The more I see from the AF-S 300 F4, the more I want one ;).
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

HI

Postby yeocsa on Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:20 pm

HI

thanks. i am very happy with this lens.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby fozzie on Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:21 pm

Arthur - great shot 8) .

I used this lens at Birddog's last month, and very impressed with sharpness, weight and balance. Reports indicate that it is just as sharp with TC x 1.4 on. Have you tried it with TC on :?:
fozzie

When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:26 pm

fozzie wrote:Arthur - great shot 8) .

I used this lens at Birddog's last month, and very impressed with sharpness, weight and balance. Reports indicate that it is just as sharp with TC x 1.4 on. Have you tried it with TC on :?:


Hi

Yes. I did. I have a 1.4X Kenko Pro. Sharpness and bokeh are top notch - beat all the lens i had before including Canon 17-40L and 70-200L lens.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques