Page 1 of 1

Deodorant?

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:59 pm
by sirhc55
Of course I am wearing deodorant :!:

Image

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:01 pm
by Hlop
Great one, Chris! :)

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:03 pm
by JordanP
I love the colour, exposure and detail in the feathers in this shot. Was this one shot with the new sigma lens ... very nice.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:08 pm
by sirhc55
Thanks guys - yes shot with the 70-200mm Sigma at 200mm f/4.8 350th sec handheld iso 200.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:32 pm
by Matt. K
Supurb quality! That lens rocks!

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 11:40 pm
by stormygirl
This is great, Chris. Wonderful details, colour and beautifully crisp.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:02 am
by MCWB
Ouch, it's so sharp it scratched the inside of my monitor! :evil: Looks like you're enjoying your new lens hey Chris? You're really making it sing, excellent stuff.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:38 am
by Justin
Great shot - what is the lens?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:43 am
by sirhc55
Justin wrote:Great shot - what is the lens?


Listed above but I will say again as I love this lens - the Sigma 7-200mm f/2.8

I am trying to emulate my 70-200 hero - Kerry :D

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:09 am
by Soulboy
Super colours - not just the bird but the branch too. What bird is it?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:23 am
by marcus
Grey feathered ass facing deodorising wing sniffing minor I think Soulboy. BTW awesome shot Chris.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:24 am
by Soulboy
marcus wrote:Grey feathered ass facing deodorising wing sniffing minor I think Soulboy.


Thanks for confirming that marcus - I looked it up in my big book of grey arse facing birds but wasn't quite sure whether it was the deordorising or "'bout time I 'ad a wash" version. ;)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:27 am
by fozzie
Chris - well done, I especially love the colours :) . Don't you just love it, when bird/s refuse to turn around so you can to shot with your camera head or side on. BTW: You know quailfy to be Kerry Pierce's apprentice :wink: .

Cheers,

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:45 am
by leek
It never ceases to amaze me where birds can put their beaks :shock:

V Sharp Chris... I love the feather detail...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 11:05 am
by sirhc55
And dogs their tongues - yuk

:roll:

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 11:18 am
by KerryPierce
sirhc55 wrote:
Justin wrote:Great shot - what is the lens?


I am trying to emulate my 70-200 hero - Kerry :D


:lol: I had to clean the coffee off my monitor after reading this... :P

I must say, you're easily doing the same as I, because arse shots are my specialty. :shock:

Image

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:30 pm
by Justin
It is a good result... I need more of a zoom so how much is it and where in or around inner-city Sydney can I get one???

Bugger!

I have a 28-200 'Koboron' that I picked up second hand - fully manual everything and even better the zoom will slide by itself if not left horizontal :roll: - it's time for a new lens!

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:42 pm
by gstark
Chris,

Great image, and it goes to proive one thing: it's not the gear that makes the photo - it's the photographer.

Justin, how deep are your pockets? :)

If they're not too deep, look around for a pre-loved 70-210. They're very sharp, but not overly expensive. If you need more reach, look for a 70-300, but try to avoid the G, which is not just cheap, but cheep and, in some examples, softer than a down pillow.

If your pockets are deeper, the 80-400VR and/or 70-200VR would be the way to go, but you're now talking 1600 - 2500 Pacific Pesos.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:52 pm
by Justin
Hi, I would like to keep it somewhere between 300 to definitely less than 500 pacific pesos...

Is the 70-210 a Nikon or Sigma? How much did you pay for the 70-200 sigma?

I've decided that if I go for any lens above 500 it's going to be from the 'people who have bought my photos fund' (current standing at zero and not likely to change)

I don't think I need more than 200mm though (famous last words?)

I think for my photography it's more about using the tele for DOF effects than getting close to a birds arse :wink: and with 200 you can get some really small DOF

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:59 pm
by gstark
Justin wrote:Hi, I would like to keep it somewhere between 300 to definitely less than 500 pacific pesos...

Is the 70-210 a Nikon or Sigma? How much did you pay for the 70-200 sigma?


Are there lenses that fit Nikon cameras that are not made by Nikon? :)

Justin, the only non-Nikon glass we have in this household is the Bronica glass we have for our Bronica 645. Go figure.


I don't think I need more than 200mm though (famous last words?)

I think for my photography it's more about using the tele for DOF effects than getting close to a birds arse :wink: and with 200 you can get some really small DOF


Scout around for the pre-loved Nikkor 70-210 then. It's a great lens, and you should find one (I think) in your budget. What's on eBay ?

I'll refrain from commenting on what you might be able to see with with that 210 lens and a bird's rear end.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:31 pm
by sirhc55
Justin - check this out - only a couple of hours to go:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3343&item=7507275154&rd=1

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:31 pm
by zeb00
KerryPierce wrote:
sirhc55 wrote:
Justin wrote:Great shot - what is the lens?


I am trying to emulate my 70-200 hero - Kerry :D


:lol: I had to clean the coffee off my monitor after reading this... :P

I must say, you're easily doing the same as I, because arse shots are my specialty. :shock:


That makes 2 of us

http://photos.kernalpanic.org/image.php ... ext=48.jpg

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:40 pm
by Glen
Chris great shot with the coke bottle :wink:

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:47 pm
by KerryPierce
zeb00 wrote:
KerryPierce wrote:I must say, you're easily doing the same as I, because arse shots are my specialty. :shock:


That makes 2 of us

http://photos.kernalpanic.org/image.php ... ext=48.jpg


That's a great shot. :D heh, there's always one in every crowd, that's just can't get with the program. :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 2:12 pm
by gstark
sirhc55 wrote:Justin - check this out - only a couple of hours to go:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3343&item=7507275154&rd=1


Justin,

That's exactly the glass I'm talking about. That looks to be good value.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 3:12 pm
by Justin
It does look good - thanks for the search, your help is much appreciated! - on the larger picture I can see sand grains and I'm thinking it's lived it's life on Magnetic island - but I'll keep my eyes open!

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 3:39 pm
by Alex
Beautiful shot, Chris.
Alex

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:46 pm
by Matt. K
Chris
Did you use a contrast mask on that image?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:52 pm
by sirhc55
Matt. K wrote:Chris
Did you use a contrast mask on that image?


Hi Matt

As far as I can remember I used levels, curves and USM

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 5:39 pm
by stubbsy
Chris

That is one awesome shot. I can't believe how much detail there is given the fact it had to be dappled lighting yet there are no blown highlights in the sky through the trees. Feathers and branch are so sharp I could cut myself.

Exceptional image - thanks for sharing this one.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:21 pm
by fozzie
Last Sunday these two birds just would not show their best end, so this was the result:-

Image

Nikon 70-200VR + TC17E11
270mm
1/500
f/5
ISO200

Comments most welcomed.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:11 pm
by sirhc55
2 bums Fozzie - they are little buggers for not turning round :roll:

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 10:17 pm
by birddog114
sirhc55 wrote:2 bums Fozzie - they are little buggers for not turning round :roll:


Get a stick and tickle them :lol:

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 10:18 pm
by sirhc55
Birddog114 wrote:
sirhc55 wrote:2 bums Fozzie - they are little buggers for not turning round :roll:


Get a stick and tickle them :lol:


I love tickling the birds - but not this kind :roll: