~Port of Los Angeles~

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

~Port of Los Angeles~

Postby flipfrog on Tue Apr 19, 2005 6:52 am

Image

Image
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby MCWB on Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:44 am

Wow, the colours in the second are wonderful, perhaps a little too saturated for my liking, but still great. Wonderful shot, though I'd have liked perhaps a little less water and a bit more sky?

With the first one, the blown highlight draws me away from the bridge and the rest of the subject matter, and keeps doing so despite my attempts to refocus, so it doesn't do much for me I'm afraid. :( If you could PS it out or something I'd love the shot!
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby dooda on Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:51 am

Hey Dee,

These are pretty cool. I love the golden reflection in the water of the 1st, but it would probably work a little darker as well.

The second looks a little oversaturated, which seems to be your style, but I think it is a touch oversaturated for me as well. Most of your pics sort of walk that fine line which is good I think. BTW I'm moving to the West End. THinking about joining the legendary West End Photographic society. Have you heard of them? Do you go down there much?
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby flipfrog on Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:15 am

thanks for the critiques guys...
i think ill work on them both...

Dave:
never heard of it, what's it all about?
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:55 pm

I like the first one... a bit postcard-ish for my taste, but I do like it.

The second one is too saturdated for my liking... I feel my eye keeps attacking small bits of red in the background as opposed to looking at the whole of the image.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Onyx on Tue Apr 19, 2005 2:56 pm

You worked the shadows too hard in the first on I feel... to the point the colour noise detracts from the image IMHO.

Second is extremely saturated. Too rule of thirdish to me. I'd have preferred a crop leaving out all the featureless water.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Click on Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 pm

Flip Frog
love the first!
Second one I love the colour saturation, my opinion I suppose. Like MCWB has pointed out though, more of the saturated sky would've looked better than so much water in the frame, from my point of view.
Personally I would've Photoshopped the word "hatsu" out, detracts from the true subject I think.
Otherwise GOOD JOB! :wink:
Respect to those who click!
Click
Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Perth WA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques