Qantas 737 or 767 landing at night

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Qantas 737 or 767 landing at night

Postby kipper on Tue Apr 26, 2005 6:24 pm

Pretty sure this is a 737, don't think it's a 767 or an Airbus. Could be wrong though.

ISO: 1600
Focal Length: 200
Shutter: 1/125
Aperture: F/2.8
Mode: Manual
Metering: Matrix
Noise: Lots of It
Time: 6.45pm (about 30-60min after sunset)

Post processing: Exposure correction and Noise Ninjaed (first attempt at)

Image
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby darb on Tue Apr 26, 2005 6:36 pm

mmm yeah, great idea, but i dont find much interesting ... except the headlights. Not sure how you could better do it though, except maybe at sunset or sunrise when there is a bit of subtle light to play with.
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby PiroStitch on Tue Apr 26, 2005 6:54 pm

Love the fact that it looks like some sort of alien ship :)

Personally, I would've cloned out what looks like the wing tip on the right and play around with the position of the plane during PP.
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Apr 26, 2005 7:02 pm

Kipper like Pirostitch - I like this shot because it is not the normal run-of-the-mill plane shots and I would clone out the wing tip on the right :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby meicw on Tue Apr 26, 2005 7:45 pm

I like it. BTW it is either a 737-800 or an A320. (Note the winglets.) From the angle it hard to judge, but looking at the size of them I would go for the 737.

Regards
Meicw
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby fozzie on Tue Apr 26, 2005 7:47 pm

kipper - well done.

I agree with Chris, to remove right of picture wing tip.
fozzie

When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Postby Killakoala on Tue Apr 26, 2005 8:07 pm

It's interesting because it's a different perspective of a common theme.

Nice one :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby kipper on Tue Apr 26, 2005 8:15 pm

Darb, yeah it's not the best. However I was at Melbourne Airport from 4.30pm when there was lots of light till about 7pm. I was hoping to catch a 747 with a bit at sunset. I waited at the end that they usually come in but nothing for 2hours. In the end I gave up and moved down to where the domestics came in but at that stage all light had gone. I think this was the first of the domestics that I caught coming in.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby MHD on Tue Apr 26, 2005 8:16 pm

Sorry Darb... I love this photo.... If I had to chose POTW this would be it...

It is so different... I love the cabin lights...

It makes me think of flying into a strange airport so far from home....
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Matt. K on Tue Apr 26, 2005 8:41 pm

Full marks for technique and creativity. The image works for me and demands a good look.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby phillipb on Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:11 pm

I like this photo too, but I disagree with the cropping of the light on the wing tip, if anything I would like to make it more prominent. I tried covering it with my thumb and what you are left with is a lot of empty black space. I think that light gives it a better sense of proportion to the plane.
Just my opinion.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby Alex on Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:19 pm

I like the shot, Darryl. I think the bit of wing lights on the right add to the mystery.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby PiroStitch on Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:23 pm

 AFAIK Qantas only uses Boeings for domestic, so it's either 737 or 767...I'm to going to with the latter if my crappy memory serves me right.
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby big pix on Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:40 pm

Great shot, the wing tip just adds to the mystery....... but I would not have the image in the centre of the frame as it is not going anywhere, have the image a bit to the top right, so it is flying in or bottom left so it is flying out, I think the latter would be best

cheers
big pix
Last edited by big pix on Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby mic on Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:41 pm

I'd clone out the light on the wing tip

Then >

Invert it ( No, I'm serious, try it and see ) I didn't tamper with it and post it as I thought you would have a Hissy.

Now you could say it's different than just a plane in the night sky with it's lights showing.

Just my opinion, I think it looks sensational Inverted.

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby kipper on Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:49 pm

I wouldn't of had a hissy. Im not like that.

Oh god I just wasted 10minutes of my life playing with various filters. Think I just made a spaceship.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby mic on Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:58 pm

He heeeh ehhhh :lol: :lol: :lol:

The best 10 minutes of your life kip

Mic :wink:

The StarShip SS Kipper :D
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby leek on Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:58 pm

big pix wrote:have the image a bit to the top right, so it is flying in or bottom left so it is flying out, I think the latter would be best


I think the plane is travelling Left --> Right, but I know what you mean...

Great shot BTW... It got me thinking... BTW it could even be an Airbus - such is the untargetted asset strategy of Qantas...
I'm Pretty sure that it's a 767 with those upturned wing-tips though...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby big pix on Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:02 pm

The main focus point of the shot is almost in the centre, it should be moved a bit lower and to the left more and maybe a bit of a twist to the left also, just to make it a bit more interesting


bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Re: Qantas 737 or 767 landing at night

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Apr 27, 2005 1:24 am

Interesting and creative shot, Darryl. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby redline on Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:16 pm

looks very interesting kipper,
what day did you shoot on?
have you try shooting near the golf course on certain days? planes fly straight by it
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby kipper on Sat Apr 30, 2005 10:55 am

Redline, Saturday 23rd April 6.30-6.45pm. Was on the Tullamarine / Sunbury Rd. Up near the gate that they're letting all the workmen in. There is a section where everyone drives off the road and parks near where the planes fly over Sunbury Rd.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby SteveGriffin on Sat Apr 30, 2005 11:14 am

It is a Boeing 737-838.

Statistics:
Maximum Take-off Weight 79,015 kg/ 174,200 lb
Wing Span 35.8m/ 117.5 ft
Overall Length 39.5m/ 129.6 ft
Vertical Fin Height 12.6m/ 41.3 ft
Cabin Width 3.54m/ 11.62 ft
Wing Area 124.6 sq m/ 1,341 sq ft
Average Cruise Speed 853 kph/ 530 mph
Cruise Altitude 33,000 to 41,000 ft
Maximum Fuel Capacity 26,025 litres/ 6,875 US gallons
Range With Full Payload 4,800km/ 2990 miles
Freight Capacity 6,220kg/ 13,710 lb
Volumetric Payload 21,390kg/ 47,100 lb
Maximum Thrust 116.99 kN/ 26,300 lb
Engines 2xCFM56-7B26 BTW I really like the shot but then again I pretty much like any aeroplane shot :shock:

Definately don't clone out the winglet as that is the best identifying feature
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques