Posting from a New Member

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Posting from a New Member

Postby anubis on Mon May 02, 2005 12:52 pm

Hi guys,

Well this is My First Post.

Enclosed is an image from my favourite Formula 1 team Mclaren. Taken with a D70 with a NIKKOR 70-300 ED Lens at the 2005 Melbourne Grandprix. Note it was taken through a Grill at about 200MM using JPEG FINE mode, ISO 200 on the camera.

Used Photoshop to crop and resize for display on the web, no image manipulations (although it seems to have lost a sig amount of image data in the upload to pixspot).

Am very interested in comments and suggestions to improve , which I am sure there are plenty :)


Image
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby MCWB on Mon May 02, 2005 1:14 pm

Firstly, welcome! Secondly, that's a great shot, especially considering the conditions. My only criticism is that it's not that sharp, but the image still works. Any more from the weekend? I *so* want a press pass to the GP, no more pesky fences! ;)
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby genji on Mon May 02, 2005 1:20 pm

welcome anubis, (a reference to sg1?)

yeah, the fence spoils an otherwise great image.
User avatar
genji
Senior Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------

Postby sirhc55 on Mon May 02, 2005 1:27 pm

Welcome Anubis - considering the obstacles this is a very fine pic :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby gstark on Mon May 02, 2005 1:29 pm

Welcome.

Great shot; where were you seated to get this sort of view?

The reason the image is a little soft is the lens, btw. The 70-300 isn't the sharpest piece of glass doing the rounds.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Nnnnsic on Mon May 02, 2005 2:02 pm

I'll post some of my 70-300 shots from the race soon so you can get the idea of how soft the 70-300 really can be...
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Glen on Mon May 02, 2005 2:22 pm

Anubis, welcome and great shot even with the fence, the fence just takes a little from it.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby anubis on Mon May 02, 2005 3:52 pm

Hi guys, thanks for the feedback, am enclosing a couple of other photos I took during the weekend, Montoyas Mclaren was taken at 300mm from the Clark Stand (quite a distance from the track and behind wire), whereas the pic below this of the Mild Seven Renault was taken while in scruitineering after the race in the pits.

Image

Image

Speaking of soft images what zoom lens could I purchase that would sharpen up these images cost less than say AUD 1400 and not weigh a tonne (i.e. 1.5 Kgs)....? What are you all using...? PS: The first pick I posed was from about 100 metres from turn 1 on the main straight I took it at Friday Free Practice standing in the rain..... and the name Anubis, one of my hobbies is Egyptology so its from that, although I am also a big fan of sg1!.
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby Manta on Mon May 02, 2005 4:08 pm

Welcome Anubis and thanks for posting these shots.
Being a Merc owner, I'm a big McLaren fan too. I was in Melbourne 2 years ago to see Coulthard take them to victory and it was a sweet result. Love to get back there soon.

I'm not too concerned about the fences in your photos. It's hard enough to get a clean image even without the fences as your panning has to be spot on. I find I don't even see the blur of the wire and concentrate more on the car detail.

Well done.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby ozczecho on Mon May 02, 2005 4:20 pm

Like the shot from Clark stand...its not a bad location to watch the race from...

I thought Montoya played tennis... :wink:
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby gstark on Mon May 02, 2005 4:39 pm

I use the Nikkor 80-400 VR.

Much sharper than the 70-300 - they're really on different planets - and priced just a tad beyond the pricing you mentioned, if you get it imported from HK. See our bargain pages ...

Glen: not any more; he found it was far too dangerous. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby leek on Tue May 03, 2005 3:39 pm

Great shots anubis...
Nice to get up close and personal like that...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Tue May 03, 2005 3:43 pm

Yes, great shots Anubis - as to a lens in your price range there is always the Sigma 70-200mm :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby anubis on Tue May 03, 2005 7:35 pm

Hi Guys, BTW thanks for the Welcome !!!.

Have noticed that Nikon produce(d) a 80-200 D ED Lens with a constant F2.8 aperture. Do any of you guys have it and still use it? If so do you recommend I get one?. Also, does the lens require a tripod/monopod or can it be used effectively handheld....?

I suppose one of the things that I would like is that for my zoom not to weigh a ton.

Thanks again for all the feedback.
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby birddog114 on Tue May 03, 2005 7:38 pm

anubis wrote:Hi Guys, BTW thanks for the Welcome !!!.

Have noticed that Nikon produce(d) a 80-200 D ED Lens with a constant F2.8 aperture. Do any of you guys have it and still use it? If so do you recommend I get one?. Also, does the lens require a tripod/monopod or can it be used effectively handheld....?

I suppose one of the things that I would like is that for my zoom not to weigh a ton.

Thanks again for all the feedback.


The Nikkor 80-200 AF-D/ AF-S are the old production from Nikon, the replacement is Nikkor 70-200VR, you can still buy the 80-200/2.8 AF-D with tripod collar new but the AF-S 80-200/2.8 is hard to find.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques