Posting from a New MemberModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Posting from a New MemberHi guys,
Well this is My First Post. Enclosed is an image from my favourite Formula 1 team Mclaren. Taken with a D70 with a NIKKOR 70-300 ED Lens at the 2005 Melbourne Grandprix. Note it was taken through a Grill at about 200MM using JPEG FINE mode, ISO 200 on the camera. Used Photoshop to crop and resize for display on the web, no image manipulations (although it seems to have lost a sig amount of image data in the upload to pixspot). Am very interested in comments and suggestions to improve , which I am sure there are plenty
Firstly, welcome! Secondly, that's a great shot, especially considering the conditions. My only criticism is that it's not that sharp, but the image still works. Any more from the weekend? I *so* want a press pass to the GP, no more pesky fences!
Welcome.
Great shot; where were you seated to get this sort of view? The reason the image is a little soft is the lens, btw. The 70-300 isn't the sharpest piece of glass doing the rounds. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I'll post some of my 70-300 shots from the race soon so you can get the idea of how soft the 70-300 really can be...
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Hi guys, thanks for the feedback, am enclosing a couple of other photos I took during the weekend, Montoyas Mclaren was taken at 300mm from the Clark Stand (quite a distance from the track and behind wire), whereas the pic below this of the Mild Seven Renault was taken while in scruitineering after the race in the pits.
Speaking of soft images what zoom lens could I purchase that would sharpen up these images cost less than say AUD 1400 and not weigh a tonne (i.e. 1.5 Kgs)....? What are you all using...? PS: The first pick I posed was from about 100 metres from turn 1 on the main straight I took it at Friday Free Practice standing in the rain..... and the name Anubis, one of my hobbies is Egyptology so its from that, although I am also a big fan of sg1!.
Welcome Anubis and thanks for posting these shots.
Being a Merc owner, I'm a big McLaren fan too. I was in Melbourne 2 years ago to see Coulthard take them to victory and it was a sweet result. Love to get back there soon. I'm not too concerned about the fences in your photos. It's hard enough to get a clean image even without the fences as your panning has to be spot on. I find I don't even see the blur of the wire and concentrate more on the car detail. Well done. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
I use the Nikkor 80-400 VR.
Much sharper than the 70-300 - they're really on different planets - and priced just a tad beyond the pricing you mentioned, if you get it imported from HK. See our bargain pages ... Glen: not any more; he found it was far too dangerous. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Great shots anubis...
Nice to get up close and personal like that... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Yes, great shots Anubis - as to a lens in your price range there is always the Sigma 70-200mm
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Hi Guys, BTW thanks for the Welcome !!!.
Have noticed that Nikon produce(d) a 80-200 D ED Lens with a constant F2.8 aperture. Do any of you guys have it and still use it? If so do you recommend I get one?. Also, does the lens require a tripod/monopod or can it be used effectively handheld....? I suppose one of the things that I would like is that for my zoom not to weigh a ton. Thanks again for all the feedback.
The Nikkor 80-200 AF-D/ AF-S are the old production from Nikon, the replacement is Nikkor 70-200VR, you can still buy the 80-200/2.8 AF-D with tripod collar new but the AF-S 80-200/2.8 is hard to find. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|